VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.211: the four advance tax instalments, and the single 15 March instalment for a s.44AD or s.44ADA presumptive assessee
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.211s.211(1)s.211(2)s.44ADs.44ADAs.234Cs.234C(1)(b)s.210s.156

Statutory position — s.211: the four advance tax instalments, and the single 15 March instalment for a s.44AD or s.44ADA presumptive assessee

My client returns income under s.44AD. The CPC has charged s.234C interest on four instalments. Is a presumptive assessee not entitled to pay the whole advance tax by 15 March?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

My client returns income under s.44AD. The CPC has charged s.234C interest on four instalments. Is a presumptive assessee not entitled to pay the whole advance tax by 15 March?

He is. Section 211(1) now splits assessees into two classes: clause (a) covers 'all the assessees, other than the assessee referred to in clause (b)', who pay in four instalments — fifteen per cent by 15 June, forty-five per cent by 15 September, seventy-five per cent by 15 December and the whole by 15 March, each cumulative and reduced by earlier instalments; clause (b) covers 'an assessee who declares profits and gains in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 44AD or sub-section (1) of section 44ADA', who pays 'to the extent of the whole amount of such advance tax during each financial year on or before the 15th March'. Section 234C(1)(b) mirrors this exactly, charging a presumptive assessee interest only on the shortfall from the tax due on the returned income as at 15 March.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2017-04-01, reported as Section 211 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as amended up to 2025; clause (1)(b) in its present form substituted by the Finance Act, 2017, s.74, operative from 1 April 2017 by force of s.1(2) of that Act. It bears on section 211, section 211(1), section 211(2), section 44AD, section 44ADA, section 234C, section 234C(1)(b), section 210, section 156 of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Presumptive Taxation & Audit, Assessment & Scrutiny and Demand, Recovery & Stay matters.

Still good law. The section appears identically on two separately published versions, and its presumptive limb is matched by section 234C(1)(b) as currently published. Clause (1)(b) in its present form was substituted by section 74 of the Finance Act, 2017, in force from 1 April 2017 by section 1(2) of that Act, so the position stated here governs the financial year 2017-18 onwards. For earlier years clause (b) reached only an eligible assessee in an eligible business under section 44AD, and a section 44ADA professional paid in four instalments. The original insertion of clause (b), and the date on which the four-instalment schedule was extended to non-corporate assessees, could not be dated here. Validity has not been checked against any judicial decision, so nothing on this page should be read as a statement of how the section has been construed. Two practical points follow. A presumptive assessee's single instalment on or before 15 March is a concession on the schedule and not on the liability: section 234C(1)(b) charges one per cent simple interest on the shortfall where what is paid by that date falls short of the tax due on the returned income, so the whole of the advance tax has to be estimated by then. And the concession attaches to an assessee who declares profits and gains under section 44AD(1) or section 44ADA(1); an assessee who is eligible but does not declare on that footing falls under clause (a) and owes four instalments. A practitioner should check the schedule in force for the year in issue rather than assume this one.

Why it matters

Getting this wrong costs the client s.234C interest on four instalment dates instead of one, and the error is easy to make because the s.211 table looks like the whole of the section. Three practical points. First, the clause (b) route depends on the assessee actually declaring profits and gains in accordance with s.44AD(1) or s.44ADA(1) — it is keyed to the basis on which the income is returned, not merely to eligibility, so an eligible assessee who returns his real profits under the normal provisions falls back into clause (a) and its four instalments. Second, clause (b) is confined to those two sub-sections; it does not on its words extend to s.44AE, s.44B, s.44BB or s.44BBB, and an assessee under those provisions pays in four instalments. The date matters as much as the wording. Clause (b) in its present form was substituted by s.74 of the Finance Act, 2017, which replaced the earlier words "an eligible assessee in respect of an eligible business referred to in section 44AD" with the present formula covering s.44AD(1) and s.44ADA(1); s.75 of the same Act made the mirror substitution in s.234C(1)(a) and (1)(b). By s.1(2) of that Act, sections 2 to 88 came into force on 1 April 2017. So for the financial year 2016-17 and earlier, clause (b) reached only an eligible assessee in an eligible business under s.44AD, and a s.44ADA professional was in clause (a) on four instalments — do not apply the present single-instalment rule to that year. Third, the proviso to s.211(1) is easy to miss and is worth real money: 'any amount paid by way of advance tax on or before the 31st day of March shall also be treated as advance tax paid during the financial year ending on that day for all the purposes of this Act', so a payment made between 16 and 31 March is still advance tax — it does not cure the s.234C shortfall at 15 March, but it is advance tax for s.234B and for s.219 credit rather than self-assessment tax. Section 211(2) deals separately with the case where a s.156 notice under a s.210(3) or (4) order is served after a due date: the tax is then payable on such of the due dates as fall after service.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 34 on s.44AD · all 34 on s.156 · all 28 on s.234C

Used in these worked examples

Notice situations where this decision carries one of the steps.
A consultant who filed at six per cent under s.44AD, recast at fifty per cent, and then told that no presumptive section applies to him at allThe officer says my work is technical consultancy so s.44AD is shut to me, and that my receipts are above the s.44ADA ceiling so that section is shut too - where does that leave me on income, books, audit and penalty?Three interests, a refund taken back, and an assessment order that says only that interest is to be charged as per lawThe assessment has charged me s.234A, s.234B and s.234C, withdrawn the refund I was paid at processing and charged interest on that too - what can I actually fight, and where do I take it?