VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — ss.207(1) and 208: who has to pay advance tax at all, and the ten thousand rupee threshold
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.207s.207(1)s.208s.209s.234Bs.234C

Statutory position — ss.207(1) and 208: who has to pay advance tax at all, and the ten thousand rupee threshold

The notice charges me interest under s.234B for not paying advance tax. Before I argue about the computation, was I even liable to pay advance tax in the first place?

The notice charges me interest under s.234B for not paying advance tax. Before I argue about the computation, was I even liable to pay advance tax in the first place?

Two conditions have to be satisfied before any advance tax liability arises. Section 207(1) makes tax payable in advance during a financial year, in accordance with ss.208 to 219, in respect of the total income of the assessee which would be chargeable for the assessment year immediately following that financial year — that income being called the "current income"; and s.208 then says advance tax shall be payable during a financial year only in every case where the amount of such tax payable by the assessee during that year, computed in accordance with Chapter XVII-C, is ten thousand rupees or more.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2025-04-01, reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, ss.207(1) and 208, as printed on the departmental section pages stamped Year: 2025 and Year: 2024 (No. 1). It bears on section 207, section 207(1), section 208, section 209, section 234B, section 234C of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Assessment & Scrutiny, Demand, Recovery & Stay and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Still good law. Two departmental pages of different vintage (Year: 2025 and Year: 2024 (No. 1)) print identical text for each section, which is the strongest evidence available this pass that no later amendment has displaced them. That is not a substitute for reading the current Finance Act: no Finance Act text was retrieved for s.208 this pass, and the ten thousand rupee figure could not be dated. Validity was not checked against any judicial decision.

Why it matters

Section 234B(1) charges interest only on an assessee 'who is liable to pay advance tax under section 208'. So the s.208 threshold is not a concession — it is a jurisdictional fact for the interest charge, and if the advance tax computed under s.209 comes to less than ten thousand rupees there is no advance tax liability and therefore nothing for s.234B or s.234C to bite on. Two things are constantly got wrong here. First, the ten thousand rupee test is applied to the advance tax as computed under the whole of Chapter XVII-C — that is, after the s.209(1)(d) reduction for tax deductible or collectible at source — and not to the gross tax on total income; a salaried assessee whose entire tax is covered by s.192 deduction has no advance tax liability at all. Second, s.207(1) fixes the base as the current income of the financial year, so the charge is on an estimate made prospectively, not on the assessed income determined years later; s.234B then bridges the gap by working on the assessed tax. Note also that s.207(1) is expressly 'in accordance with the provisions of sections 208 to 219 (both inclusive)', which is what makes the machinery sections — s.209 computation, s.210 payment, s.211 instalments, s.219 credit — conditions of the charge rather than administrative detail.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.