VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — ss.196A, 196B and 196C: three fixed-rate deduction sections for non-residents, only one of which carries a treaty proviso, and none of which is in the s.197 list
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysSuperseded by amendments.196As.196Bs.196Cs.195s.197s.115ABs.115ACs.10(23D)s.10(35)s.90s.90A

Statutory position — ss.196A, 196B and 196C: three fixed-rate deduction sections for non-residents, only one of which carries a treaty proviso, and none of which is in the s.197 list

We are remitting income on mutual fund units to a foreign company, and separately paying on Global Depository Receipts. Do we deduct under section 195 at rates in force, and can the payee get a lower deduction certificate?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

We are remitting income on mutual fund units to a foreign company, and separately paying on Global Depository Receipts. Do we deduct under section 195 at rates in force, and can the payee get a lower deduction certificate?

No. Where one of these three sections applies, it and not section 195 supplies the rate, and the rate is a figure fixed in the section rather than the 'rates in force'. Section 196A covers income in respect of units of a Mutual Fund specified under clause (23D) of section 10, or from the specified company referred to in the Explanation to clause (35) of section 10, paid to a non-resident not being a company or to a foreign company, at twenty per cent; it alone carries a proviso letting the rate fall to the treaty rate where an agreement under section 90(1) or section 90A(1) applies and the payee has furnished the certificate referred to in section 90(4) or section 90A(4). Section 196B covers income in respect of units referred to in section 115AB, and long-term capital gains on their transfer, payable to an Offshore Fund. Section 196C covers interest or dividends on bonds or Global Depository Receipts referred to in section 115AC, and long-term capital gains on their transfer, payable to a non-resident. Sections 196B and 196C each now carry a three-limb rate: ten per cent on the income, ten per cent on long-term capital gains where the transfer takes place before 23 July 2024, and twelve and one-half per cent where it takes place on or after that date. None of the three sections is in the list in section 197(1).

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2024-07-23, reported as Sections 196A, 196B and 196C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as amended up to 2024. It bears on section 196A, section 196B, section 196C, section 195, section 197, section 115AB, section 115AC, section 10(23D), section 10(35), section 90, section 90A of the Income Tax Act 1961, in TDS Defaults, Capital Gains and Residence & Treaty Benefit matters.

Superseded by amendment. Two of the three sections have been amended since 2023 and the entry is written against their current text. Section 196A carries the footnote 'Inserted by the Finance Act, 2023, w.e.f. 1-4-2023' against its proviso, which is the treaty limb; before that date the section charged twenty per cent with no statutory route to a treaty rate at the deduction stage. Sections 196B and 196C each carry a footnote recording the substitution of the present three-limb rate for the earlier flat rate by Act No. 15 of 2024 with effect from 23 July 2024, and the earlier text of section 196B still prints the flat ten per cent. That is why the status here is 'superseded by amendment': a payment made in respect of a transfer before 23 July 2024 is governed by words the current text no longer prints. The section 197 point is drawn from the list printed in section 197(1), which names sections 192, 193, 194, 194A, 194C, 194D, 194G, 194H, 194-I, 194J, 194K, 194LA, 194LBA, 194LBB, 194LBC, 194M, 194-O, 194Q and 195, and does not name any of these three. That is a reading of the list as printed, not a conclusion from any decision. What is not established here is whether a deductor under section 196B or section 196C may apply a treaty rate. Those sections contain no proviso permitting it, unlike section 196A. The entry records that absence and stops there; it does not say that a treaty rate is unavailable, because section 90(2) and the authorities on it are not examined. No judicial decision on any of the three sections is recorded, and nothing is said about how the Offshore Fund definition in section 115AB, or the Global Depository Receipt definition in section 115AC, has been applied.

Why it matters

A remitter who reaches for section 195 by reflex gets three things wrong at once. The rate is wrong, because these sections fix a figure and section 195 imports the rates in force. The machinery is wrong, because there is no application to the Assessing Officer under section 195(2) for a payment these sections govern. And the relief is wrong, because the section 197 certificate the payee expects to be able to obtain does not exist here — the list in section 197(1) runs through the 194 series and ends at section 195, and sections 196A, 196B and 196C are simply not in it. A payee told to apply for a certificate will apply, be refused, and lose the time. The difference between the three sections is worth holding precisely. Section 196A is the only one with a treaty proviso, and the proviso is conditional: the agreement under section 90(1) or section 90A(1) must apply to the payee and the payee must have furnished the certificate referred to in section 90(4) or section 90A(4). Without that certificate in hand the deductor applies twenty per cent, whatever the treaty says. Section 196A is also the only one with a carve-out, in sub-section (2), for Unit Trust of India units acquired by a non-resident Indian or a non-resident Hindu undivided family out of a Non-resident (External) Account or by remittance in foreign currency. Sections 196B and 196C have neither. What they have instead is a date. Since 23 July 2024 each carries a rate that splits according to when the transfer 'takes place' — ten per cent before that day, twelve and one-half per cent on or after it — while the income limb, interest or dividends under section 196C and unit income under section 196B, stays at ten per cent throughout. A deductor who applies the gains rate to the income limb, or who takes the date of remittance instead of the date of transfer, is short or excess by two and a half points on a figure that is usually large. Both errors surface as section 201 demands on the payer, not on the payee who has already been paid.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 90 on s.90 · all 65 on s.195 · all 25 on s.197