VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.178: the liquidator's thirty-day notice, the amount he must set aside, and his personal liability for the company's tax if he does not — and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code carve-out in s.178(6) from 1 November 2016
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.178s.178(1)s.178(2)s.178(3)s.178(4)s.178(5)s.178(6)

Statutory position — s.178: the liquidator's thirty-day notice, the amount he must set aside, and his personal liability for the company's tax if he does not — and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code carve-out in s.178(6) from 1 November 2016

I have just been appointed liquidator of a company. What do I have to tell the income-tax department, by when, and what happens to me personally if I distribute the assets before I hear back?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

I have just been appointed liquidator of a company. What do I have to tell the income-tax department, by when, and what happens to me personally if I distribute the assets before I hear back?

You are personally liable. Section 178(4) provides in terms that if the liquidator fails to give the notice required by sub-section (1), or fails to set aside the amount required by sub-section (3), or parts with any of the assets of the company or the properties in his hands in contravention of sub-section (3), 'he shall be personally liable for the payment of the tax which the company would be liable to pay', capped by the proviso at the amount notified under sub-section (2) if an amount has been notified. The two duties that trigger it are short and dated: within thirty days after becoming liquidator you must give notice of your appointment to the Assessing Officer entitled to assess the company's income (sub-section (1)); and once the Assessing Officer notifies you of the amount he considers sufficient to provide for the company's tax — which he must do within three months of receiving your notice (sub-section (2)) — you must set that amount aside, and until you do you must not part with any of the assets (sub-section (3)(b)). Before you are notified, you must not part with any assets at all without the leave of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (sub-section (3)(a)).

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2016-11-01, reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.178, sub-sections (1) to (6), as printed on the Year 2024 (No. 2) and Year 2025 departmental pages. It bears on section 178, section 178(1), section 178(2), section 178(3), section 178(4), section 178(5), section 178(6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Demand, Recovery & Stay, Assessment & Scrutiny and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Still good law. Sub-sections (1) to (5) appear in the same words in every published version of this section from 1996 to 2025 that has been read, and the only substantive change established is to sub-section (6). That change matters and is the reason for the label being qualified here rather than in the text: for a liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the section no longer overrides, and the Telangana High Court in Leo Edibles and Fats Limited v. Tax Recovery Officer (Central) (26 July 2018), which is already in this library, held that in such a liquidation the Income-tax Department can no longer claim the priority section 178(2) and (3) give and must take recourse to distribution under section 53 of the Code. Any authority applying section 178 priority to a liquidation under the Code is superseded by that amendment. No amendment footnote is published for section 178 at all, so the 1 November 2016 date rests on the Leo Edibles judgment and on the corroboration recorded in the editor note rather than on an amendment footnote, and that is said plainly here rather than implying an official source for it. Two further points belong on any checklist. The thirty-day notice under sub-section (1) and the setting aside under sub-section (3) are separate obligations, and sub-section (4) makes a failure of either enough to fasten personal liability on the liquidator, capped only where an amount has actually been notified under sub-section (2). And sub-section (5) attaches those obligations to all liquidators jointly and severally, so a liquidator who joined late cannot treat the notice as somebody else's default.

Why it matters

Section 178 is one of the few provisions in the Act that makes a professional personally liable for someone else's tax, and the liability is not discretionary or fault-graded — it follows from the failure. Note how the cap works: the proviso limits the personal liability to the notified amount only 'if the amount of any tax payable by the company is notified under sub-section (2)'. If no amount has been notified, because you never gave the notice, there is no cap on the face of the sub-section, so the liquidator who does not write at all is in a worse position than the liquidator who writes and then errs. Sub-section (5) attaches the same obligations and liabilities to every one of several liquidators jointly and severally, so a co-liquidator cannot point at his colleague. Two escape valves are built into the proviso to sub-section (3): the liquidator may part with assets for the purpose of paying the company's tax, for making payment to secured creditors whose debts are entitled under law to priority of payment over debts due to Government at the date of liquidation, and for meeting such costs and expenses of the winding up as the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner considers reasonable. The single most important thing to check before applying any of this is the source of the liquidation. Sub-section (6) used to say the section had effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other law; it now reads 'except the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016)', so for a liquidation under the Code section 178 does not override, and the Department cannot claim the priority it gives. The section applies also to a person appointed receiver of any assets of a company, not only to a liquidator in a winding up.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.