Our family trust has determinate shares, mostly interest and rent, and a small share of profit from a partnership business. The Assessing Officer has charged the entire trust income at the maximum marginal rate. Can he, when the shares are fixed?
Yes, and the fact that the shares are determinate is irrelevant. Section 161(1A) opens 'Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1)', so the beneficiary-rate protection in section 161(1) is displaced entirely: where any income in respect of which a person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv) is liable as representative assessee 'consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business', tax is charged on the WHOLE of the income in respect of which he is so liable at the maximum marginal rate. The single proviso is narrow and cumulative — it disapplies the sub-section only where the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person BY WILL, exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance, and that trust is the ONLY trust so declared by him. Sub-section (1A) was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985.
Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 1985-04-01, reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.161(1A), inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985 (footnote 28 on the departmental page stamped Year 2000). It bears on section 161(1A), section 161, section 161(1), section 160(1)(iv), section 160, section 164, section 164A, section 2(29C) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Charitable Trusts & Exemption, Assessment & Scrutiny and How Tax Law Is Read matters.
This is the provision that quietly destroys private family trusts, and it is missed because the section it sits in reads, in sub-section (1), like a taxpayer-protective provision. Four features have to be held together. First, the trigger is contamination, not proportion: the words are 'consists of, or includes', so a small share of business profit taints everything, and the charge then falls not on the business income but on 'the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable'. Second, it does not care whether the shares are determinate — unlike section 164, which is about indeterminate shares, section 161(1A) bites a perfectly specific trust. Third, it reaches only the person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv), that is the trustee of a trust declared by a duly executed instrument in writing, whether testamentary or otherwise; a guardian under clause (ii) or a court-appointed receiver under clause (iii) is outside it, and a trustee of an oral trust under clause (v) is dealt with more harshly still by section 164A. Fourth, the proviso saves far less than people assume. It is not a proviso for testamentary trusts generally. All three of its conditions must be met — declared by will, exclusively for a dependent relative's support and maintenance, and the sole such trust declared by that person — and if the beneficiaries include anyone who is not a relative dependent on the settlor for support and maintenance, the proviso is gone. Note the parallel structure in section 164: its second proviso does the same job there, restricting the escape routes in the first proviso to the same will-trust-for-a-dependent-relative case wherever the relevant income includes business profits. In other words, whether the trust is specific or discretionary, business income drives it to the maximum marginal rate unless it is a sole will trust for a dependent relative.
Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.
Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.
Section 161(1A), as printed identically on eight year-stamped departmental pages: 'Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any income in respect of which the person mentioned in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 160 is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax shall be charged on the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable at the maximum marginal rate : Provided that the provisions of this sub-section shall not apply where such profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by any person by will exclusively for the benefit of any relative dependent on him for support and maintenance, and such trust is the only trust so declared by him.' The person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv) is a trustee appointed under a trust declared by a duly executed instrument in writing, whether testamentary or otherwise, including a wakf deed valid under the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913.
Where any income in respect of which the trustee of a written or testamentary trust is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax is charged on the whole of that income at the maximum marginal rate, notwithstanding section 161(1) and irrespective of whether the beneficiaries' shares are determinate. The proviso disapplies the sub-section only where three conditions are all satisfied: the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person by will; the trust is exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance; and it is the only trust so declared by him. The sub-section was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985.
Not applicable — this is a statement of statutory text and of the amendment footnote printed on the same departmental page. No judicial reasoning is involved.
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any income in respect of which the person mentioned in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 160 is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax shall be charged on the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable at the maximum marginal rate
Upload it and we will read it, work out your deadline and draft the reply. A CA reviews before anything is filed.
Handle my notice → Ask a CA on WhatsAppYes, and the fact that the shares are determinate is irrelevant. Section 161(1A) opens 'Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1)', so the beneficiary-rate protection in section 161(1) is displaced entirely: where any income in respect of which a person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv) is liable as representative assessee 'consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business', tax is charged on the WHOLE of the income in respect of which he is so liable at the maximum marginal rate. The single proviso is narrow and cumulative — it disapplies the sub-section only where the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person BY WILL, exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance, and that trust is the ONLY trust so declared by him. Sub-section (1A) was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985. This was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) and bears on section 161(1A), section 161, section 161(1), section 160(1)(iv), section 160, section 164, section 164A, section 2(29C) of the Income Tax Act 1961. It is reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.161(1A), inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985 (footnote 28 on the departmental page stamped Year 2000). This is the provision that quietly destroys private family trusts, and it is missed because the section it sits in reads, in sub-section (1), like a taxpayer-protective provision. Four features have to be held together. First, the trigger is contamination, not proportion: the words are 'consists of, or includes', so a small share of business profit taints everything, and the charge then falls not on the business income but on 'the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable'. Second, it does not care whether the shares are determinate — unlike section 164, which is about indeterminate shares, section 161(1A) bites a perfectly specific trust. Third, it reaches only the person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv), that is the trustee of a trust declared by a duly executed instrument in writing, whether testamentary or otherwise; a guardian under clause (ii) or a court-appointed receiver under clause (iii) is outside it, and a trustee of an oral trust under clause (v) is dealt with more harshly still by section 164A. Fourth, the proviso saves far less than people assume. It is not a proviso for testamentary trusts generally. All three of its conditions must be met — declared by will, exclusively for a dependent relative's support and maintenance, and the sole such trust declared by that person — and if the beneficiaries include anyone who is not a relative dependent on the settlor for support and maintenance, the proviso is gone. Note the parallel structure in section 164: its second proviso does the same job there, restricting the escape routes in the first proviso to the same will-trust-for-a-dependent-relative case wherever the relevant income includes business profits. In other words, whether the trust is specific or discretionary, business income drives it to the maximum marginal rate unless it is a sole will trust for a dependent relative. If it applies to you, the first step is this: Before anything else, identify every rupee of 'profits and gains of business' in the trust's income, including a share of profit from a firm in which the trust is a partner. If there is any, section 161(1) is displaced and arguing about beneficiary rates is wasted effort.
Section 161(1A), as printed identically on eight year-stamped departmental pages: 'Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any income in respect of which the person mentioned in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 160 is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax shall be charged on the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable at the maximum marginal rate : Provided that the provisions of this sub-section shall not apply where such profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by any person by will exclusively for the benefit of any relative dependent on him for support and maintenance, and such trust is the only trust so declared by him.' The person mentioned in section 160(1)(iv) is a trustee appointed under a trust declared by a duly executed instrument in writing, whether testamentary or otherwise, including a wakf deed valid under the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913. The matter was decided on 1985-04-01 by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text). On those facts the CBDT Circulars & Instructions held as follows. Where any income in respect of which the trustee of a written or testamentary trust is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax is charged on the whole of that income at the maximum marginal rate, notwithstanding section 161(1) and irrespective of whether the beneficiaries' shares are determinate. The proviso disapplies the sub-section only where three conditions are all satisfied: the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person by will; the trust is exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance; and it is the only trust so declared by him. The sub-section was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985.
Not applicable — this is a statement of statutory text and of the amendment footnote printed on the same departmental page. No judicial reasoning is involved. In the words reproduced by the source cited on this page: "Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any income in respect of which the person mentioned in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 160 is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax shall be charged on the whole of the income in respect of which such person is so liable at the maximum marginal rate"
It was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions on 1985-04-01 and is reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.161(1A), inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985 (footnote 28 on the departmental page stamped Year 2000). Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them. A CBDT circular or instruction binds officers of the department but not the assessee and not the courts. Where a circular helps you, you may hold the department to it. Where it hurts you, it cannot override the Act or a judgment. On section 161(1A), section 161, section 161(1), section 160(1)(iv), section 160, section 164, section 164A, section 2(29C), the practical question is whether the facts of your own notice match the facts of this case closely enough for the same rule to apply.
It cuts both ways and is cited by both sides. Where any income in respect of which the trustee of a written or testamentary trust is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax is charged on the whole of that income at the maximum marginal rate, notwithstanding section 161(1) and irrespective of whether the beneficiaries' shares are determinate. The proviso disapplies the sub-section only where three conditions are all satisfied: the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person by will; the trust is exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance; and it is the only trust so declared by him. The sub-section was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985. It arises in Charitable Trusts & Exemption, Assessment & Scrutiny and How Tax Law Is Read matters, on section 161(1A), section 161, section 161(1), section 160(1)(iv), section 160, section 164, section 164A, section 2(29C) of the Income Tax Act 1961, and was decided by Not applicable — statutory text. Before relying on it, read the source linked on this page and check whether it has since been distinguished, overruled or overtaken by an amendment to the Income Tax Act. In practice the steps that follow from it are these. Do not concede the characterisation. Whether a receipt is profits and gains of business, as against income from house property or income from other sources, is the fight worth having, because the consequence is the whole income and not just that receipt. If you want the proviso, prove all three limbs on the documents: that the trust was declared by will, that it is exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on the testator for support and maintenance, and that it is the only trust so declared by him. Get the will, the probate and a statement of the testator's other trust declarations on record. Check the class of beneficiaries against the words 'any relative dependent on him for support and maintenance'. A beneficiary outside that description defeats the proviso whatever the will says. Confirm you are dealing with a section 160(1)(iv) trustee. A guardian under clause (ii), or a court-appointed receiver or manager under clause (iii), is not within section 161(1A) at all. If the trust is an oral trust, stop reading section 161(1A) and go to section 164A, which charges the maximum marginal rate on the whole income with no proviso whatever. For a trust with indeterminate shares AND business income, read section 164's second proviso alongside this sub-section — the escape routes in section 164's first proviso are cut down to the same will-trust case. For structuring going forward, the only reliable way out of section 161(1A) is to keep business income out of the trust — hold the business through a separate vehicle rather than in the trust's hands.
Still good law. Sub-section (1A) and its proviso are printed word for word identically on departmental pages stamped Year 2000, 2018, 2019 (No. 1), 2022, 2023, 2024 (No. 1), 2024 (No. 2) and Year 2025, which is the best evidence obtainable this pass that the sub-section stands unamended. No page stamped Year 2026 was located for this section and no Finance Act text was read, so nothing after the Year 2025 page is certified. Later judicial treatment of section 161(1A) was NOT checked this pass and no citator search was run. No source could be cited for that finding. Checking whether an authority still stands matters as much as knowing what it held: a decision may be overruled on one point and survive on another, or the provision it interprets may have been amended since. Read the source and the editor's note on this page before relying on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal.
'decided_on' is 1 April 1985, the COMMENCEMENT DATE of sub-section (1A) as recorded in footnote 28 on the Year 2000 departmental page — 'Inserted by the Finance Act, 1984, w.e.f. 1-4-1985'. It is not a decision date; this is a statutory entry, 'bench' is 'Not applicable — statutory text' and 'favours' is null. The commencement is established, not assumed: I re-fetched https://incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-161 (Year: 2000) with an express demand that it transcribe sub-section (1A) INCLUDING every footnote marker and show where each marker sits, and it returned marker 28 immediately before the opening bracket of '(1A)'. I did NOT independently verify from any source read this pass that the Finance Act, 1984 bears a particular Act number, and I therefore give the amending statute by the name the departmental footnote uses and nothing more. The text of sub-section (1A) and its proviso was transcribed identically from eight year-stamped pages: /w/section-161 (2000), -65 (2018), -66 (2019 (No. 1)), -60 (2022), -61 (2023), -62 (2024 (No. 1)), -63 (2024 (No. 2)) and -64 (2025). I deliberately state NO figure for the maximum marginal rate: the expression is defined in section 2(29C) by reference to the Finance Act of the relevant year, I did not retrieve section 2(29C) this pass (https://incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-2-29c returns 404 and I had no web-search budget left to find the correct suffix), and a rate stated from memory is exactly the defect this library exists to avoid. The reader must apply section 2(29C) with the Finance Act of the relevant year. The definition itself IS retrievable and was transcribed on verification from two year-stamped departmental pages of section 2 — https://incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-2-64 (Year: 2024 (No. 1)) and https://incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-2-65 (Year: 2024 (No. 2)) — which print it word for word identically: '(29C) "maximum marginal rate" means the rate of income-tax (including surcharge on income-tax, if any) applicable in relation to the highest slab of income in the case of an individual, association of persons or, as the case may be, body of individuals as specified in the Finance Act of the relevant year;'. Two things follow that a reader needs: the rate INCLUDES surcharge, and it is the rate on the highest slab for an individual, association of persons or body of individuals, not a company rate. It still fixes no percentage — the percentage comes from the Finance Act of the relevant year, which is why no figure is stated here. (The URL /w/section-2-29c does 404; the definition lives inside the section 2 pages, whose suffixes follow the same -6x pattern as the rest of this Chapter.) Every word of the statutory text quoted in this entry was transcribed this pass from incometaxindia.gov.in section pages, each of which was made to print its section HEADING and its "Year:" stamp alongside the text, and each of which named the Act as the Income-tax Act, 1961. No text in this entry comes from an indiankanoon bare-act page, from a commentary, or from memory. This library shows the verification state of every entry openly. This entry has not yet been read in full by a chartered accountant. The summary reflects the sources listed on this page. Read the source before you rely on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Where any income in respect of which the trustee of a written or testamentary trust is liable as representative assessee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, tax is charged on the whole of that income at the maximum marginal rate, notwithstanding section 161(1) and irrespective of whether the beneficiaries' shares are determinate. The proviso disapplies the sub-section only where three conditions are all satisfied: the profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person by will; the trust is exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance; and it is the only trust so declared by him. The sub-section was inserted by the Finance Act, 1984 with effect from 1 April 1985.
Every entry in this library links to where it was found, so you can check it yourself rather than take our word for it.
Can they attach your bank account while the stay application is still pending?
CPC charged surcharge at the top rate on my discretionary trust's small income. Is that right?
I credited commission in my books to a foreign selling agent who works entirely outside India, and remitted it later. Is that commission taxable in India in his hands?
A discretionary trust distributed income to me during the year and the trustees have already been assessed on it. Can the Assessing Officer also assess me?