VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — section 115UB: the Category I and II AIF pass-through, the charge on the fund's own income, and why a Category III AIF is outside the section
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.115UBs.10(23FBA)s.10(23FBB)s.194LBBs.115Us.10(23FB)

Statutory position — section 115UB: the Category I and II AIF pass-through, the charge on the fund's own income, and why a Category III AIF is outside the section

My client has invested in an Alternative Investment Fund. Is the fund's income taxed in the fund's hands or in his, and does it matter which category the fund is?

My client has invested in an Alternative Investment Fund. Is the fund's income taxed in the fund's hands or in his, and does it matter which category the fund is?

It matters more than anything else: section 115UB applies only to a fund granted a certificate of registration as a Category I or a Category II Alternative Investment Fund, so a Category III AIF is outside the section altogether and is taxed under the ordinary law applicable to its legal form. For a fund within the section, income accruing to a unit holder out of investments made in the fund is chargeable in his hands as if he had made the investments directly and retains its character, except income chargeable under the head profits and gains of business or profession, which is taxed in the fund's own hands — at Finance Act rates if the fund is a company or a firm, and at the maximum marginal rate in any other case.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2016-04-01, reported as Chapter XII-FB, consisting of section 115UB, inserted by the Finance Act, 2015 (Act No. 20 of 2015) with effect from 1 April 2016; text as printed on the Income Tax Department's section 115UB page stamped Year 2026. It bears on section 115UB, section 10(23FBA), section 10(23FBB), section 194LBB, section 115U, section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Charitable Trusts & Exemption, Capital Gains Exemptions, How Tax Law Is Read, Assessment & Scrutiny and Capital Gains matters.

Still good law. The text was read in full on the department's section 115UB page carrying the current 'Year: 2026' stamp and the correct heading and Act name. The Chennai Tribunal, in DCIT v. Sundaram Alternative Opportunities Series High Yield Secured Debt Fund (ITA Nos. 3532 and 3533/Chny/2025, pronounced 1 June 2026), states the same scheme at its paragraph 12, and section 194LBB (read on a page stamped Year 2025) cross-refers to 'an investment fund specified in clause (a) of the Explanation 1 to section 115UB', confirming that definition is the operative gate. Later treatment of the section by any court was not checked beyond the two Tribunal orders read this pass.

Why it matters

The first thing to check on any AIF question is the category on the SEBI certificate, because the whole regime turns on it, and Explanation 1(a) to section 115UB is where the limitation sits. That Explanation also now extends the definition to a fund regulated under the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Fund Management) Regulations, 2022 — an IFSC fund management entity's scheme can therefore be an 'investment fund' for this section. Three further points recur in practice. First, the carve-out worked by sections 10(23FBA) and 10(23FBB) — which sit outside this section — is defined by HEAD of income, not by activity description: an Assessing Officer who re-labels interest, capital gains or a fee as business income destroys the pass-through for that stream, which is exactly the fight in the Chennai Tribunal's Sundaram Alternative Opportunities order. Second, Explanation 1(c) defines 'unit' as the beneficial interest of an investor 'in the investment fund or a scheme of the investment fund', which is the statutory foothold for the position that a scheme floated under a registered AIF trust need not itself hold a SEBI registration — the point decided in the Mumbai Tribunal's Edelweiss Crossover Opportunities order. Third, sub-section (6) deems income not actually paid or credited to have been credited on the last day of the previous year, so the unit holder is taxed on accrual at fund level whether or not he has received anything, and Explanation 2 then prevents the same income being taxed again when it is actually paid.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.