VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.115-O(6), (7) and (8): the SEZ developer exemption that died on 1 June 2011, the business trust carve-out and the IFSC unit carve-out
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysValidity unconfirmeds.115-O(6)s.115-O(7)s.115-O(8)s.115-Os.2(13A)s.10(23FC)

Statutory position — s.115-O(6), (7) and (8): the SEZ developer exemption that died on 1 June 2011, the business trust carve-out and the IFSC unit carve-out

My client is an SEZ developer and paid no DDT on dividends declared out of current income. The Assessing Officer says the exemption was withdrawn. When did it go, and are there other carve-outs I should be looking at?

My client is an SEZ developer and paid no DDT on dividends declared out of current income. The Assessing Officer says the exemption was withdrawn. When did it go, and are there other carve-outs I should be looking at?

Section 115-O(6) exempted from tax on distributed profits any amount declared, distributed or paid on or after 1 April 2005 out of its current income by an undertaking or enterprise engaged in developing, or developing and operating, or developing, operating and maintaining a Special Economic Zone, in the hands of the developer or enterprise or the person receiving the dividend — but its proviso says in terms that the provisions of that sub-section shall cease to have effect from 1 June 2011. Two other carve-outs sit alongside it and are still worth checking for a pre-2020 year: sub-section (7) for a specified domestic company distributing to a business trust out of current income on or after the specified date, and sub-section (8) for a company that is a unit of an International Financial Services Centre deriving income solely in convertible foreign exchange, on amounts declared on or after 1 April 2017 out of current income or income accumulated as such a unit after 1 April 2017.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2020-04-01, reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.115-O(6), (7) and (8), as printed on the departmental page stamped Year: 2026. It bears on section 115-O(6), section 115-O(7), section 115-O(8), section 115-O, section 2(13A), section 10(23FC) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Capital Gains Exemptions and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Validity check could not be completed. Validity check could not be completed. Sub-sections (6) to (8) were read on one departmental page only (Year: 2026), and the pages carry no footnote list, so neither the insertion nor any later amendment of these sub-sections could be dated to an Act. The 1 June 2011 sunset in the proviso to sub-section (6) is printed in the statutory text itself and is reliable to that extent. No case law on any of these three sub-sections was searched for this pass.

Why it matters

The SEZ exemption is the one that generates the assessments, because the sunset is written into the sub-section itself and the two limbs of it are easy to conflate. The exemption ran only to dividend declared, distributed or paid on or after 1 April 2005 and, by force of the proviso, ceased to have effect from 1 June 2011. It was also confined to distributions 'out of its current income' — a distribution out of accumulated profits was never covered, even inside the window. Note the unusual reach of the sub-section: it exempted the amount 'either in the hands of the Developer or enterprise or the person receiving such dividend', which is why the shareholder's position is bound up in the same words. Sub-section (7) is narrower than practitioners expect. The 'specified domestic company' is defined in its own Explanation as a domestic company in which a business trust has become the holder of the WHOLE of the nominal value of the equity share capital, excluding only shares mandatorily held by another person under a law or a Government or regulatory direction, or held by a Government or Government body; and the 'specified date' is the date the business trust acquired that holding. The proviso then pulls back the exemption for anything declared, distributed or paid at any time out of accumulated profits and current profits up to the specified date. So a partial holding gets nothing, and the pre-acquisition profit pool gets nothing. Sub-section (8) requires three things together — a company that is a unit of an International Financial Services Centre as defined in s.2(q) of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, a unit established in an IFSC on or after 1 April 2016, and income derived solely in convertible foreign exchange as treated by the Reserve Bank under FEMA — and covers only amounts declared on or after 1 April 2017 out of current income or income accumulated as an IFSC unit after 1 April 2017. Sub-section (8) is NOT the abolition provision: the end of the DDT regime was effected by inserting the words 'but on or before the 31st day of March, 2020' into sub-section (1), not by any sunset sub-section.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.