My closely held company changed hands and the Assessing Officer has knocked out the brought-forward loss under section 79. The section has been rewritten more than once — which text governs my assessment year?
Four different texts of s.79 have governed the last decade, and the one that applies is the one in force for the assessment year in which the set-off is claimed. The Finance Act 2017 (Act 7 of 2017) substituted s.79 with effect from 1 April 2018 in a clause (a) and clause (b) form; the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019 (Act 23 of 2019) substituted it again with effect from 1 April 2020 into the present sub-section (1), (2) and (3) form; the Finance Act 2021 and the Finance Act 2022 added carve-outs with effect from 1 April 2022; and the Finance Act 2023 (Act 8 of 2023) substituted 'ten' for 'seven' in the start-up proviso with effect from 1 April 2023.
Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2020-04-01, reported as Substituted by the Finance Act, 2017 (Act No. 7 of 2017) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; third proviso inserted by the Finance Act, 2018 (Act No. 13 of 2018) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (Act No. 23 of 2019) w.e.f. 1 April 2020; amended by the Finance Act, 2021 (Act No. 13 of 2021) and the Finance Act, 2022 (Act No. 6 of 2022), both w.e.f. 1 April 2022; 'seven' substituted by 'ten' by the Finance Act, 2023 (Act No. 8 of 2023) w.e.f. 1 April 2023. It bears on section 79, section 79(1), section 79(2), section 79(3), section 80-IAC, section 72A, section 47, section 32(2), section 2(18) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Assessment & Scrutiny, How Tax Law Is Read and Deductions & Disallowances matters.
The version matters in a way that decides cases. The start-up relief the Board and the trade both describe as 's.79(1)(b)' exists as clause (b) of s.79 only for Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20; from Assessment Year 2020-21 that relief lives in the proviso to s.79(1) and there is no clause (b) at all. Citing 's.79(1)(b)' for a later year is citing a provision that is not there. Second, the number of years for which a start-up's loss is protected changed from seven to ten only from Assessment Year 2023-24 — for AY 2022-23 and earlier it is seven, and an adviser who reads 'ten' off a current bare Act and applies it to AY 2021-22 gets the answer wrong. Third, the carve-outs accumulated: the death-or-gift and the foreign-holding-company-amalgamation carve-outs date from the 2017 substitution; the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code resolution plan carve-out was added by the Finance Act 2018 with effect from 1 April 2018 (as a third proviso, later s.79(2)(c)); the Companies Act s.241/242 carve-out arrived with the 2019 substitution; and the relocation carve-out in s.79(2)(e) and the strategic-disinvestment carve-out in s.79(2)(f), with its clawback in s.79(3), came in with effect from 1 April 2022. Fourth, and this is the point the Supreme Court settled in CIT v. Subhulaxmi Mills Ltd., s.79 speaks of 'loss' and does not on its terms reach unabsorbed depreciation carried forward under s.32(2) — so an officer applying s.79 to depreciation is applying it beyond its words. Finally, an authority decided on the pre-2017 text is not authority for AY 2018-19 onwards; the label for such an authority offered as live law for a later year is 'superseded by amendment'.
Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.
Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.
Not applicable — statutory text. Section 79 applies to a company in which the public are not substantially interested, where a change in shareholding has taken place during the previous year. The current text is: sub-section (1), the fifty-one per cent beneficial voting-power continuity test measured on the last day of the previous year against the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred, with a proviso relieving an eligible start-up referred to in s.80-IAC where all the shareholders who held voting-power shares on the last day of the loss year continue to hold those shares on the last day of the previous year and the loss was incurred during the period of ten years beginning from the year of incorporation; sub-section (2), which disapplies sub-section (1) in six cases, namely (a) a change consequent on the death of a shareholder or transfer of shares by way of gift to a relative of the donor, (b) a change in the shareholding of an Indian company which is a subsidiary of a foreign company as a result of amalgamation or demerger of a foreign company subject to fifty-one per cent shareholder continuity, (c) a change pursuant to a resolution plan approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, (d) a company and its subsidiary and that subsidiary's subsidiary where the Tribunal has under s.241 of the Companies Act 2013 suspended the Board and appointed Central Government nominees and the change is pursuant to a resolution plan approved by the Tribunal under s.242, again after hearing the jurisdictional PCIT or CIT, (e) a change on account of relocation referred to in the Explanation to clauses (viiac) and (viiad) of s.47, and (f) an erstwhile public sector company where the ultimate holding company, immediately after completion of strategic disinvestment, continues to hold at least fifty-one per cent of the voting power directly or through subsidiaries; and sub-section (3), which reapplies sub-section (1) for any previous year after completion of strategic disinvestment in which the condition in clause (f) is not complied with, and for subsequent previous years. The Explanation defines subsidiary (more than half in nominal value of the equity share capital), adopts the s.72A meanings of 'erstwhile public sector company' and 'strategic disinvestment', and adopts the Companies Act 2013 s.2(90) meaning of 'Tribunal'.
Statutory position — no holding is asserted; this entry reproduces statutory text and its commencement dates. For Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance Act 2017, in which the fifty-one per cent test is clause (a), the start-up relief is clause (b) with a seven-year window, and the death-or-gift, foreign-amalgamation and IBC carve-outs are the first, second and third provisos. From Assessment Year 2020-21 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019, in which the fifty-one per cent test is sub-section (1), the start-up relief is the proviso to sub-section (1), and the carve-outs are clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (2). From Assessment Year 2022-23 clauses (e) and (f) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) are also in force. From Assessment Year 2023-24 the start-up window is ten years and not seven.
Not applicable — statutory text. The commencement dates are taken from the amendment footnotes printed on the department's own year-stamped section pages: 'Sub. by the Act No. 7 of 2017 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)' and 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2018 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)' on the pages stamped Year 2018 and Year 2019 (No. 1); 'Sub. by the Act. No. 23 of 2019, w.e.f. 1-4-2020' on the page stamped Year 2021; 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2021, w.e.f. 1-4-2022' and 'Ins. by the Act No. 6 of 2022, w.e.f. 1-4-2022' on the page stamped Year 2022; and 'Sub. for "seven" by the Act No. 08 of 2023, w.e.f. 1-4-2023' on the pages stamped Year 2023 onwards. Reliance on the year-stamped archived pages here is for legislative history only; the current text is stated from the page stamped Year 2025.
Provided that even if the said condition is not satisfied in case of an eligible start-up as referred to in section 80-IAC, the loss incurred in any year prior to the previous year shall be allowed to be carried forward and set off against the income of the previous year if all the shareholders of such company who held shares carrying voting power on the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred, continue to hold those shares on the last day of such previous year and such loss has been incurred during the period of ten years beginning from the year in which such company is incorporated.
Upload it and we will read it, work out your deadline and draft the reply. A CA reviews before anything is filed.
Handle my notice → Ask a CA on WhatsAppFour different texts of s.79 have governed the last decade, and the one that applies is the one in force for the assessment year in which the set-off is claimed. The Finance Act 2017 (Act 7 of 2017) substituted s.79 with effect from 1 April 2018 in a clause (a) and clause (b) form; the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019 (Act 23 of 2019) substituted it again with effect from 1 April 2020 into the present sub-section (1), (2) and (3) form; the Finance Act 2021 and the Finance Act 2022 added carve-outs with effect from 1 April 2022; and the Finance Act 2023 (Act 8 of 2023) substituted 'ten' for 'seven' in the start-up proviso with effect from 1 April 2023. This was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) and bears on section 79, section 79(1), section 79(2), section 79(3), section 80-IAC, section 72A, section 47, section 32(2), section 2(18) of the Income Tax Act 1961. It is reported as Substituted by the Finance Act, 2017 (Act No. 7 of 2017) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; third proviso inserted by the Finance Act, 2018 (Act No. 13 of 2018) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (Act No. 23 of 2019) w.e.f. 1 April 2020; amended by the Finance Act, 2021 (Act No. 13 of 2021) and the Finance Act, 2022 (Act No. 6 of 2022), both w.e.f. 1 April 2022; 'seven' substituted by 'ten' by the Finance Act, 2023 (Act No. 8 of 2023) w.e.f. 1 April 2023. The version matters in a way that decides cases. The start-up relief the Board and the trade both describe as 's.79(1)(b)' exists as clause (b) of s.79 only for Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20; from Assessment Year 2020-21 that relief lives in the proviso to s.79(1) and there is no clause (b) at all. Citing 's.79(1)(b)' for a later year is citing a provision that is not there. Second, the number of years for which a start-up's loss is protected changed from seven to ten only from Assessment Year 2023-24 — for AY 2022-23 and earlier it is seven, and an adviser who reads 'ten' off a current bare Act and applies it to AY 2021-22 gets the answer wrong. Third, the carve-outs accumulated: the death-or-gift and the foreign-holding-company-amalgamation carve-outs date from the 2017 substitution; the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code resolution plan carve-out was added by the Finance Act 2018 with effect from 1 April 2018 (as a third proviso, later s.79(2)(c)); the Companies Act s.241/242 carve-out arrived with the 2019 substitution; and the relocation carve-out in s.79(2)(e) and the strategic-disinvestment carve-out in s.79(2)(f), with its clawback in s.79(3), came in with effect from 1 April 2022. Fourth, and this is the point the Supreme Court settled in CIT v. Subhulaxmi Mills Ltd., s.79 speaks of 'loss' and does not on its terms reach unabsorbed depreciation carried forward under s.32(2) — so an officer applying s.79 to depreciation is applying it beyond its words. Finally, an authority decided on the pre-2017 text is not authority for AY 2018-19 onwards; the label for such an authority offered as live law for a later year is 'superseded by amendment'. If it applies to you, the first step is this: Write down the assessment year of the set-off and pull the text of s.79 in force for that year before reading any case. For AY 2018-19 and AY 2019-20 the section has clauses (a) and (b) and three provisos; from AY 2020-21 it has sub-sections (1), (2) and (3).
Not applicable — statutory text. Section 79 applies to a company in which the public are not substantially interested, where a change in shareholding has taken place during the previous year. The current text is: sub-section (1), the fifty-one per cent beneficial voting-power continuity test measured on the last day of the previous year against the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred, with a proviso relieving an eligible start-up referred to in s.80-IAC where all the shareholders who held voting-power shares on the last day of the loss year continue to hold those shares on the last day of the previous year and the loss was incurred during the period of ten years beginning from the year of incorporation; sub-section (2), which disapplies sub-section (1) in six cases, namely (a) a change consequent on the death of a shareholder or transfer of shares by way of gift to a relative of the donor, (b) a change in the shareholding of an Indian company which is a subsidiary of a foreign company as a result of amalgamation or demerger of a foreign company subject to fifty-one per cent shareholder continuity, (c) a change pursuant to a resolution plan approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, (d) a company and its subsidiary and that subsidiary's subsidiary where the Tribunal has under s.241 of the Companies Act 2013 suspended the Board and appointed Central Government nominees and the change is pursuant to a resolution plan approved by the Tribunal under s.242, again after hearing the jurisdictional PCIT or CIT, (e) a change on account of relocation referred to in the Explanation to clauses (viiac) and (viiad) of s.47, and (f) an erstwhile public sector company where the ultimate holding company, immediately after completion of strategic disinvestment, continues to hold at least fifty-one per cent of the voting power directly or through subsidiaries; and sub-section (3), which reapplies sub-section (1) for any previous year after completion of strategic disinvestment in which the condition in clause (f) is not complied with, and for subsequent previous years. The Explanation defines subsidiary (more than half in nominal value of the equity share capital), adopts the s.72A meanings of 'erstwhile public sector company' and 'strategic disinvestment', and adopts the Companies Act 2013 s.2(90) meaning of 'Tribunal'. The matter was decided on 2020-04-01 by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text). On those facts the CBDT Circulars & Instructions held as follows. Statutory position — no holding is asserted; this entry reproduces statutory text and its commencement dates. For Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance Act 2017, in which the fifty-one per cent test is clause (a), the start-up relief is clause (b) with a seven-year window, and the death-or-gift, foreign-amalgamation and IBC carve-outs are the first, second and third provisos. From Assessment Year 2020-21 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019, in which the fifty-one per cent test is sub-section (1), the start-up relief is the proviso to sub-section (1), and the carve-outs are clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (2). From Assessment Year 2022-23 clauses (e) and (f) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) are also in force. From Assessment Year 2023-24 the start-up window is ten years and not seven.
Not applicable — statutory text. The commencement dates are taken from the amendment footnotes printed on the department's own year-stamped section pages: 'Sub. by the Act No. 7 of 2017 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)' and 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2018 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)' on the pages stamped Year 2018 and Year 2019 (No. 1); 'Sub. by the Act. No. 23 of 2019, w.e.f. 1-4-2020' on the page stamped Year 2021; 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2021, w.e.f. 1-4-2022' and 'Ins. by the Act No. 6 of 2022, w.e.f. 1-4-2022' on the page stamped Year 2022; and 'Sub. for "seven" by the Act No. 08 of 2023, w.e.f. 1-4-2023' on the pages stamped Year 2023 onwards. Reliance on the year-stamped archived pages here is for legislative history only; the current text is stated from the page stamped Year 2025. In the words reproduced by the source cited on this page: "Provided that even if the said condition is not satisfied in case of an eligible start-up as referred to in section 80-IAC, the loss incurred in any year prior to the previous year shall be allowed to be carried forward and set off against the income of the previous year if all the shareholders of such company who held shares carrying voting power on the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred, continue to hold those shares on the last day of such previous year and such loss has been incurred during the period of ten years beginning from the year in which such company is incorporated."
It was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions on 2020-04-01 and is reported as Substituted by the Finance Act, 2017 (Act No. 7 of 2017) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; third proviso inserted by the Finance Act, 2018 (Act No. 13 of 2018) w.e.f. 1 April 2018; substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (Act No. 23 of 2019) w.e.f. 1 April 2020; amended by the Finance Act, 2021 (Act No. 13 of 2021) and the Finance Act, 2022 (Act No. 6 of 2022), both w.e.f. 1 April 2022; 'seven' substituted by 'ten' by the Finance Act, 2023 (Act No. 8 of 2023) w.e.f. 1 April 2023. Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them. A CBDT circular or instruction binds officers of the department but not the assessee and not the courts. Where a circular helps you, you may hold the department to it. Where it hurts you, it cannot override the Act or a judgment. On section 79, section 79(1), section 79(2), section 79(3), section 80-IAC, section 72A, section 47, section 32(2), section 2(18), the practical question is whether the facts of your own notice match the facts of this case closely enough for the same rule to apply.
It cuts both ways and is cited by both sides. Statutory position — no holding is asserted; this entry reproduces statutory text and its commencement dates. For Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance Act 2017, in which the fifty-one per cent test is clause (a), the start-up relief is clause (b) with a seven-year window, and the death-or-gift, foreign-amalgamation and IBC carve-outs are the first, second and third provisos. From Assessment Year 2020-21 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019, in which the fifty-one per cent test is sub-section (1), the start-up relief is the proviso to sub-section (1), and the carve-outs are clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (2). From Assessment Year 2022-23 clauses (e) and (f) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) are also in force. From Assessment Year 2023-24 the start-up window is ten years and not seven. It arises in Assessment & Scrutiny, How Tax Law Is Read and Deductions & Disallowances matters, on section 79, section 79(1), section 79(2), section 79(3), section 80-IAC, section 72A, section 47, section 32(2), section 2(18) of the Income Tax Act 1961, and was decided by Not applicable — statutory text. Before relying on it, read the source linked on this page and check whether it has since been distinguished, overruled or overtaken by an amendment to the Income Tax Act. In practice the steps that follow from it are these. Test the fifty-one per cent condition on the right dates: shares carrying not less than fifty-one per cent of the voting power beneficially held on the last day of the previous year must have been beneficially held by the same persons on the last day of the year or years in which the loss was incurred. For an eligible start-up under s.80-IAC, check both limbs: every shareholder who held voting-power shares on the last day of the loss year must continue to hold those shares on the last day of the set-off year, and the loss must have been incurred within seven years (up to AY 2022-23) or ten years (AY 2023-24 onwards) beginning from the year of incorporation. Run through the carve-outs in s.79(2) in the order they appear and confirm the one you rely on existed in your year — death or gift to a relative; amalgamation or demerger of a foreign holding company with fifty-one per cent continuity; an approved IBC resolution plan after hearing the jurisdictional PCIT or CIT; a Companies Act s.241/242 board-suspension resolution plan, also after hearing the PCIT or CIT; relocation under the Explanation to s.47(viiac) and (viiad); and strategic disinvestment of an erstwhile public sector company. Where the carve-out relied on is the IBC one, check that the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner was in fact afforded a reasonable opportunity of being heard — the words are in the clause and are a condition of it. Where s.79(2)(f) is relied on, diarise the clawback: s.79(3) reapplies s.79(1) for any later previous year in which the ultimate holding company's fifty-one per cent is not maintained after the strategic disinvestment. Keep unabsorbed depreciation out of the s.79 computation and cite CIT v. Subhulaxmi Mills Ltd. if the officer sweeps it in.
Still good law. This is the statute and its commencement history, not a decision about it. The current text was read on 8 September 2026 from a departmental page carrying the correct heading and the stamp Year 2025, and the same text (save for the 'seven'/'ten' change) appears on the pages stamped Year 2023, Year 2024 (No. 1) and Year 2024 (No. 2). No amendment later than the Finance Act 2023 substitution of 'ten' for 'seven' was found in any footnote list read on this pass; whether the Finance Act 2024, the Finance (No. 2) Act 2024, the Finance Act 2025 or the Finance Act 2026 touched the section has NOT been independently checked against those Acts, and the absence of a later footnote on a Year 2025 page is the only basis for saying so. The pre-2017 text of the section was not read. No source could be cited for that finding. Checking whether an authority still stands matters as much as knowing what it held: a decision may be overruled on one point and survive on another, or the provision it interprets may have been amended since. Read the source and the editor's note on this page before relying on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal.
This is a statutory entry, not a decided case. decided_on is a commencement date — 1 April 2020, the date from which the present sub-section (1), (2) and (3) structure took effect on the substitution by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019 — and not the date of any decision. Six departmental pages for s.79 were read, each with the section heading and the Year stamp demanded: Year 2018 and Year 2019 (No. 1) print the clause (a) and (b) text with footnote 'Sub. by the Act No. 7 of 2017 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)' and 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2018 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018)'; Year 2021 prints the sub-section text with footnote 'Sub. by the Act. No. 23 of 2019, w.e.f. 1-4-2020'; Year 2022 prints the sub-section text with footnotes attributing insertions to Act No. 13 of 2021 and Act No. 6 of 2022, both w.e.f. 1-4-2022, and still reads 'seven years'; Year 2023, Year 2024 (No. 1), Year 2024 (No. 2) and Year 2025 read 'ten years' with the footnote 'Sub. for "seven" by the Act No. 08 of 2023, w.e.f. 1-4-2023'. The current text stated here is taken from the page stamped Year 2025. Two cautions. First, the pre-2017 text of s.79 was not read on this pass and nothing is stated about it beyond the fact that it was substituted. Second, the departmental page at /w/section-79-67 is NOT a page for s.79 of the Income-tax Act at all — it is stamped Year 1998 and prints 'Amendment of section 16. 79. In section 16 of the Interest-tax Act', which is exactly the wrong-statute trap this project has been bitten by before; the heading-plus-year-stamp check caught it. This library shows the verification state of every entry openly. This entry has not yet been read in full by a chartered accountant. The summary reflects the sources listed on this page. Read the source before you rely on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Statutory position — no holding is asserted; this entry reproduces statutory text and its commencement dates. For Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance Act 2017, in which the fifty-one per cent test is clause (a), the start-up relief is clause (b) with a seven-year window, and the death-or-gift, foreign-amalgamation and IBC carve-outs are the first, second and third provisos. From Assessment Year 2020-21 the governing text is s.79 as substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019, in which the fifty-one per cent test is sub-section (1), the start-up relief is the proviso to sub-section (1), and the carve-outs are clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (2). From Assessment Year 2022-23 clauses (e) and (f) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) are also in force. From Assessment Year 2023-24 the start-up window is ten years and not seven.
Every entry in this library links to where it was found, so you can check it yourself rather than take our word for it.
Our shares moved from one group company to another. Do we lose our carried forward losses?
I have brought forward business losses that will lapse in a few years. Can I set them off before this year's depreciation, so the losses do not run out?
My windmill unit's early losses were already set off against my share trading profits. Must I now notionally bring those losses back and reduce the unit's profit before claiming section 80-IA?
My company absorbed a loss-making company under a court-sanctioned scheme of amalgamation, and the scheme says the transferor's losses are to be treated as mine. Can I set those accumulated losses off against my own income under the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991?