VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.194P: the specified senior citizen, the declaration, and relief from filing
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysNo later treatment founds.194Ps.139s.87As.115BAC

Statutory position — s.194P: the specified senior citizen, the declaration, and relief from filing

My client is 78, has only pension and interest from the same bank, and does not want to file a return. Does s.194P get him out of filing, and what does the bank need from him?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

My client is 78, has only pension and interest from the same bank, and does not want to file a return. Does s.194P get him out of filing, and what does the bank need from him?

Yes, but only if every condition is met, and the relief is a consequence of the bank's deduction and not of the client's age. Section 194P(2) provides that s.139 shall not apply to a specified senior citizen for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which tax has been deducted under sub-section (1) — so if the bank does not compute and deduct, the return obligation remains. Sub-section (1) requires a 'specified bank' to compute the total income after giving effect to Chapter VI-A deductions and the s.87A rebate and to deduct tax on that total income at the rates in force, and the Explanation confines a 'specified senior citizen' to a resident individual aged seventy-five or more at any time during the previous year, whose income consists of pension and no other income except interest received or receivable from an account maintained by him in the SAME specified bank in which he receives his pension, and who has furnished the prescribed declaration to that bank.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text as published by the Income Tax Department, and a notification of the Central Board of Direct Taxes) on 2021-09-02, reported as Income-tax Act 1961, s.194P; Notification No. 98/2021, S.O. 3595(E), dated 2 September 2021 (specified banks); Notification No. 99/2021, F. No. 370142/11/2021-TPL, GSR 612(E), dated 2 September 2021 (Income-tax (26th Amendment) Rules, 2021). It bears on section 194P, section 139, section 87A, section 115BAC of the Income Tax Act 1961, in TDS Defaults, Salary & Perquisites and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Searched for later treatment; none was found. That is not the same as a source affirming it. Section 194P has not been amended since it was inserted. The published text of the section records insertion by Act No. 13 of 2021, the Finance Act, 2021, with effect from 1 April 2021, and prints sub-section (1), sub-section (2) — 'The provisions of section 139 shall not apply to a specified senior citizen for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the tax has been deducted under sub-section (1)' — and the Explanation defining 'specified bank' and the three cumulative conditions of a 'specified senior citizen', in the terms this entry states. No later version of the section has been found. Section 194P is not among the sections amended by the Finance Bill, 2025, and no notification superseding Notification No. 98/2021 or Notification No. 99/2021 has been found. NO DECISION CONSTRUING THE SECTION HAS BEEN FOUND, which is why the status is 'no later treatment found' rather than 'good law'. Two consequences follow. Everything this entry says about how the conditions work is a reading of the statutory words and not authority; in particular, the propositions that sub-section (2) is conditional on the deduction actually having been made, and that the declaration under clause (iii) is a constituent of the status rather than a formality, have not been tested anywhere. And the gap in the section — it directs the bank to give effect to 'the deduction allowable under Chapter VI-A' but says nothing about which regime of rates applies, or how a client communicates a choice, when s.115BAC is the default regime and withdraws most of Chapter VI-A — is unresolved and no guidance on it has been found. This states the law under the Income-tax Act, 1961, which governs every assessment year up to and including AY 2026-27.

Why it matters

Every one of the conditions is a trap and most clients who think they qualify do not. The bank must be a 'specified bank', which the Explanation leaves to be notified by the Central Government — it is not every bank. Notification No. 98/2021, S.O. 3595(E), dated 2 September 2021, specifies for the purposes of clause (a) of the Explanation a banking company which is a scheduled bank and has been appointed as agent of the Reserve Bank of India under section 45 of the Reserve Bank of India Act 1934. That is a class and not a list, and it bears out the caution: a co-operative bank is not a banking company for this purpose. The account from which the interest arises must be in the same bank that pays the pension; a fixed deposit at another bank, however small the interest, takes the client outside the section. Any other income at all — a small capital gain, rent, a dividend, interest from a post office or a co-operative society — takes him outside it. The age test is satisfied if seventy-five is attained at any time during the previous year, which is more generous than it looks, but the residence requirement is absolute. And the declaration is not optional: clause (iii) of the definition makes furnishing it in the prescribed form part of what makes a person a specified senior citizen. The prescribed form is Form No. 12BBA under rule 26D, both introduced by the Income-tax (26th Amendment) Rules 2021, notified as Notification No. 99/2021, F. No. 370142/11/2021-TPL, GSR 612(E), dated 2 September 2021; the department's own guidance says the declaration is to be furnished to the bank in paper form and not electronically. There is a further point on which the section is silent and on which no advice should be given without checking the client's regime. Sub-section (1) directs the bank to give effect to 'the deduction allowable under Chapter VI-A', but under s.115BAC, which is the default regime from AY 2024-25, almost the whole of Chapter VI-A is unavailable. Nothing in s.194P says which regime the bank is to apply or how the client is to communicate a choice, and that gap is not resolved by the statutory words.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 35 on s.139 · all 17 on s.115BAC