VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 82
Chapter IVwas s.54

Section 82 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 82 — Profit on sale of property used for residence. Successor to s.54 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 82 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 81  ·  Section 83 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) applies where an individual or HUF has a long-term capital gain from transfer of a residential house (buildings or lands appurtenant, the income of which is chargeable under 'Income from house property') and has bought one residential house in India within one year before or two years after the transfer, or constructed one within three years after it: if the gain exceeds the cost of the new asset the excess is charged under section 67 and the new asset's cost is taken as nil for a sale within three years, and if the gain is equal to or less than that cost nothing is charged and the new asset's cost is reduced by the gain for a sale within three years. Sub-section (2) requires any amount not used before the return is filed to be deposited under a notified scheme in a specified bank or institution, by the section 263(1) due date at the latest, with proof filed with the return. Sub-section (3) treats the amount already spent plus the deposit as the cost of the new asset, and sub-section (4) charges the unutilised deposit under section 67 in the tax year in which three years from the transfer expire, allowing the assessee to withdraw it under the scheme. Sub-section (5) permits two houses instead of one where the gain does not exceed two crore rupees, sub-section (6) makes that option available once only, and sub-sections (7) and (8) cap the cost of the new asset and the capital gain taken into account at ten crore rupees each.

Why it is there

It relieves an individual or HUF who rolls the gain on one residential house into another from being taxed on the switch, with the deposit scheme covering the gap between the return filing date and the purchase or construction. The three-year cost-reduction rule, the once-only two-house option and the ten crore ceilings show the relief is aimed at genuine replacement of a home rather than repeated or very large reinvestment.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Window to purchase the new residential houseOne year before or two years afterMeasured from the date of transfer of the original assetSub-section (1)(b)
Window to construct the new residential houseThree years afterMeasured from the date of transfer of the original assetSub-section (1)(b)
Period within which a sale of the new asset triggers the cost adjustmentThree yearsFrom the purchase or construction of the new asset; cost taken as nil where the gain exceeded the cost, or reduced by the gain where it did notSub-section (1)(i) and (ii)
Deadline for depositing the unutilised gainBefore filing the return and not later than the due date under section 263(1)Deposit in a specified bank or institution under the Central Government's notified scheme, with proof filed with the returnSub-section (2)(b) and (c)
Year in which an unutilised deposit is charged to taxThe tax year in which three years from the date of transfer expireApplies to the amount deposited but not used for purchase or construction within the sub-section (1) period; charged under section 67Sub-section (4)(a)
Gains ceiling for the two-house optionTwo crore rupeesThe capital gain under sub-section (1) must not exceed this amount for the assessee to opt for two residential houses in IndiaSub-section (5)
Cap on the cost of the new assetTen crore rupeesAny excess over ten crore rupees is ignored for the purposes of sub-section (1)Sub-section (7)
Cap on the capital gain taken into account for the deposit ruleTen crore rupeesAny excess over ten crore rupees on transfer of the original asset is ignored for the purposes of sub-section (2)Sub-section (8)

What this means in practice

If the money will not be spent before you file, the deposit is not optional — sub-section (2) requires it in a specified bank or institution under the notified scheme, made by the section 263(1) due date, with proof attached to the return, and a deposit left unused is taxed in the year the three-year period ends. Selling the new house within three years is expensive: its cost is taken as nil where the original gain exceeded it, or reduced by the gain where it did not, so the relief is effectively recaptured. The two-house option under sub-section (5) is available only where the gain is two crore rupees or less, and sub-section (6) allows it for one tax year in a lifetime. Above ten crore rupees, the extra cost and the extra gain simply do not count.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual has a long-term capital gain of Rs 1.9 crore on the transfer of a residential house and, the gain not exceeding the two crore rupee ceiling in sub-section (5), opts to buy two residential houses in India instead of one. Had the gain been Rs 2.1 crore that option would have closed and only one house could have qualified under sub-section (1)(b). Having used the option once, sub-section (6) bars him from exercising it again in that or any other tax year. Whatever part of the gain is not spent before the return is filed must be deposited under the notified scheme by the section 263(1) due date with proof filed alongside the return, failing which it is charged under section 67 in the year the three years from the transfer expire.

Where you meet this section

It is claimed in the capital gains part of the return under section 263, and the proof of deposit in the specified bank or institution has to be submitted with that return under sub-section (2)(c). It comes back in an assessment for the tax year in which three years from the transfer expire, when an unutilised deposit is charged under section 67.

The words themselves

if the capital gains is equal to or less than the cost of the new asset, no capital gains shall be charged under section 67 and for computing capital gains from the transfer of the new asset within three years of its purchase or construction, the cost shall be reduced by the amount of the capital gains
s.82(1)(ii), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 82. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

Work it out

Free calculators on VittSphere ONE for the very provision this page is about. They open in the same window.

Further reading

Written up on the VittSphere ONE blog.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.