VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXI › Section 468
Chapter XXIwas s.272BB

Section 468 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 468 — Penalty for failure to comply with the provisions of section 397. Successor to s.272BB of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 468 is in Chapter XXI — Penalties, which runs from section 439 to section 472.

← Section 467  ·  Section 469 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) allows the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on a person who fails to comply with the provisions of section 397. Sub-section (2) allows the same penalty where a person required to quote his Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number in the challans, certificates, statements or other documents referred to in section 397(1)(b) quotes a number that is false, knowing or believing it to be false or not true. Both limbs are framed as a power — the Assessing Officer "may" impose the penalty.

Why it is there

Section 397 works only if the account number is obtained and quoted accurately, since it is what links a payment to the deductor; the section penalises both the failure to comply and the deliberate quoting of a wrong number.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Penalty for failure to comply with section 397Rs. 10,000Imposable at the Assessing Officer's discretion468(1)
Penalty for quoting a false account numberRs. 10,000Only where the number is quoted knowing or believing it to be false or not true — a mental element the sub-section (1) limb does not carry468(2)

What this means in practice

A failure under section 397 attracts a flat Rs. 10,000, and quoting a wrong Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number is separately exposed to the same amount where the person knew or believed the number to be false. A genuine mistake in the number is not within sub-section (2), which requires knowledge or belief, though the compliance failure limb in sub-section (1) may still be in play. The penalty is discretionary, so the circumstances of the failure are worth putting to the Assessing Officer.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A deductor leaves its Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number off the certificates and statements it issues through the year. Sub-section (1) lets the Assessing Officer impose Rs 10,000 for the failure to comply with section 397 — "may", not "shall", so the levy is a power and not automatic. If instead it quotes in those documents a number it knows or believes to be false, sub-section (2) supplies a separate Rs 10,000, but only on that mental element: a number that is simply wrong, quoted in good faith, does not fall within sub-section (2) at all.

Where you meet this section

You meet it as a penalty order of the Assessing Officer, made against the person who was required to quote the Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number in the challans, certificates, statements or other documents referred to in section 397(1)(b). The section names no form of its own — the documents in which the number belongs are those identified by section 397.

The words themselves

If a person fails to comply with the provisions of section 397, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty of Rs. 10000 on him.
Section 468(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.