VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXI › Section 467
Chapter XXIwas s.272B

Section 467 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 467 — Penalty for failure to comply with the provisions of section 262. Successor to s.272B of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 467 is in Chapter XXI — Penalties, which runs from section 439 to section 472.

← Section 466  ·  Section 468 →

What this section does

Four separate penalties, each of Rs 10,000, all imposable by the Assessing Officer. Sub-section (1): where a person fails to comply with the provisions of section 262, a penalty of Rs 10,000. Sub-section (2): where a person required to quote or intimate his Permanent Account Number or Aadhaar number in a document referred to in section 262(9)(a) provides, quotes or intimates a number which is false, knowing or believing it to be false, Rs 10,000 for each such default. Sub-section (3): where a person fails to quote or authenticate his Permanent Account Number or Aadhaar number in such a document, Rs 10,000 for each such default. Sub-section (4): where the person referred to in section 262(9)(b), responsible for ensuring correct quoting or authentication in documents relating to transactions prescribed under section 262(9)(a), fails to do so, Rs 10,000 for each such default.

The section carries a footnote recording that "section 262" was substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026.

Why it is there

The Permanent Account Number and Aadhaar number are what link a transaction to a taxpayer, so a document carrying no number, or a false one, breaks the trail at its source. The section prices that break at both ends — on the person who should quote or authenticate, and on the entity required to verify — and by charging per default keeps the sanction proportionate to the number of broken records.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Penalty for failure to comply with section 262Rs 10,000A single penalty; this sub-section does not charge per defaultSub-section (1)
Penalty for knowingly quoting a false numberRs 10,000 for each such defaultThe number in a document referred to in section 262(9)(a) must be false and the person must know or believe it to be falseSub-section (2)
Penalty for failure to quote or authenticateRs 10,000 for each such defaultIn a document referred to in section 262(9)(a)Sub-section (3)
Penalty on the person responsible for verificationRs 10,000 for each such defaultA person referred to in section 262(9)(b) who fails to ensure correct quoting or authentication in documents relating to prescribed transactionsSub-section (4)

What this means in practice

The distinction that matters is between the single penalty in sub-section (1) and the per-default penalties in sub-sections (2) to (4), which make exposure a multiple of the number of documents. Sub-section (2) needs knowledge or belief that the number is false, so an honest error moves the case to sub-section (3), where the amount is the same but no mental element is required. Sub-section (4) puts the same per-default exposure on the verifying person under section 262(9)(b), so both sides of a prescribed transaction can be penalised over the same document.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An entity required under section 262(9)(b) to ensure correct quoting of the Permanent Account Number in prescribed transaction documents fails to do so in forty documents. Sub-section (4) allows Rs 10,000 for each such default, so the exposure is Rs 4,00,000, not Rs 10,000 — the per-default measure in sub-sections (2) to (4) is what distinguishes them from the single penalty in sub-section (1).

Where you meet this section

In a penalty notice and order from the Assessing Officer, addressed either to a person who quoted no Permanent Account Number or Aadhaar number, or a wrong one, in a document prescribed under section 262(9)(a), or to the entity responsible under section 262(9)(b) for ensuring it was correctly quoted or authenticated.

The words themselves

If a person fails to comply with the provisions of section 262, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty of Rs. 10000 on him.
Section 467(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
provides or quotes or intimates a number which is false, knowing or believing it to be false, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty of Rs. 10000 on him for each such default
Section 467(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.