VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XX › Section 438
Chapter XXwas s.245

Section 438 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 438 — Set off and withholding of refunds in certain cases. Successor to s.245 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 438 is in Chapter XX — Refunds, which runs from section 431 to section 438.

← Section 437  ·  Section 439 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) allows a refund to be applied rather than paid. Where a refund becomes due or is found to be due to any person under the Act, the Assessing Officer, Commissioner, Principal Commissioner, Chief Commissioner or Principal Chief Commissioner may, in lieu of payment, set off the whole or part of it against any sum remaining payable by that person under the Income-tax Act, 1961 — those words having been inserted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026 — or under this Act. Sub-section (2) requires that any such action be taken after giving the person an intimation in writing of the action proposed.

Sub-section (3) covers what happens to the balance. Where part of the refund has been set off under sub-section (1), or no set off has been made, and a refund becomes due, the Assessing Officer, having regard to the fact that assessment or reassessment proceedings are pending in that person's case, may withhold the refund up to sixty days from the date on which such assessment or reassessment is made — but only for reasons to be recorded in writing and with the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner.

Why it is there

Paying out a refund while the same person owes tax, or while a proceeding that may itself produce a demand is under way, simply moves money that will have to be recovered again. Sub-section (1) nets the two off across both the 2025 Act and, since 1 April 2026, the Income-tax Act, 1961. Sub-section (3) is the narrower power to hold rather than net, and it is hedged with recorded reasons, an approval and a fixed end date so that it cannot become an indefinite freeze.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Outer limit for withholding a refundUp to sixty days from the date on which the assessment or reassessment is madeOnly where assessment or reassessment proceedings are pending, with reasons recorded in writing and the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or CommissionerSub-section (3)

What this means in practice

The two powers are different and only one needs approval. A set off under sub-section (1) can be made by any of five ranks and requires only a prior written intimation of the proposed action under sub-section (2). Withholding under sub-section (3) is for the Assessing Officer alone, needs reasons recorded in writing and the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and is available only while assessment or reassessment proceedings are pending. The sixty days run from the date the assessment or reassessment is made, not from the withholding order. Since 1 April 2026 the set off also reaches sums payable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, so an old demand under that Act can absorb a refund arising under this one.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual is due a refund of Rs. 6 lakh and has an outstanding demand of Rs. 4 lakh under the Income-tax Act, 1961. After an intimation in writing of the proposed action, the Rs. 4 lakh is set off under sub-section (1) as amended with effect from 1 April 2026, leaving Rs. 2 lakh. If a reassessment is pending, the Assessing Officer may withhold that Rs. 2 lakh, but only for reasons recorded in writing and with the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and only up to sixty days from the date the reassessment is made.

Where you meet this section

A taxpayer meets this section as the written intimation that his refund is proposed to be adjusted against an outstanding demand, and as the absence of a refund he expected where an assessment or reassessment is pending in his case.

The words themselves

may in lieu of payment of the refund, set off the amount to be refunded or any part of that amount, against the sum, if any, remaining payable under
Section 438(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), or
Section 438(1), inserted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026, Income-tax Act, 2025.
for reasons to be recorded in writing and with the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner, withhold the refund up to sixty days from the date on which such assessment or reassessment is made
Section 438(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 438. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Further reading

Written up on the VittSphere ONE blog.
  • Why a refund stalls — the eight things that hold a refund up, including a set-off under section 245.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.