VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XX › Section 435
Chapter XXwas s.240

Section 435 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 435 — Refund on appeal, etc. Successor to s.240 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 435 is in Chapter XX — Refunds, which runs from section 431 to section 438.

← Section 434  ·  Section 436 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) requires the Assessing Officer to refund, without any claim by the assessee, any amount that becomes due as a result of an order passed in appeal or other proceeding under the Act, except where the Act provides otherwise. Sub-section (2) qualifies when the refund becomes due in two situations: where the assessment is set aside or cancelled with a direction to make a fresh assessment, the refund becomes due only once that fresh assessment is made; and where the assessment is annulled, the refund is limited to tax paid in excess of the tax chargeable on the total income the assessee returned.

Why it is there

It makes an appellate success self-executing on the refund side so the taxpayer does not have to file a fresh claim. Sub-section (2) prevents the money going out prematurely where the matter is going back for fresh assessment, and prevents an annulment producing a refund of tax that was due on the assessee's own returned income.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Refund where the assessment is annulledOnly the tax paid in excess of the tax chargeable on the total income returned by the assesseeAn annulment does not refund tax due on the returned incomeSub-section (2)(b)
Refund where the assessment is set aside or cancelled with a direction for fresh assessmentBecomes due only on the making of the fresh assessmentNothing is refundable in the interimSub-section (2)(a)

What this means in practice

You do not have to apply — sub-section (1) places the duty on the Assessing Officer to refund on his own once an appellate or other order creates the refund. But do not expect money immediately on a remand: where the order sets aside the assessment and directs a fresh one, nothing becomes due until that fresh assessment is completed. On an annulment, the ceiling is the excess over the tax on your returned income, so tax properly payable on what you yourself returned stays with the department.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An appellate authority sets aside a company's assessment and directs a fresh one. The Rs. 80 lakh already paid does not come back at that point: sub-section (2)(a) makes the refund due only on the making of the fresh assessment, so the money stays with the Department in the meantime. Contrast an annulment — if the company had returned income on which the tax chargeable was Rs. 30 lakh and had paid Rs. 80 lakh, sub-section (2)(b) refunds only the Rs. 50 lakh excess, not the whole Rs. 80 lakh, because tax due on the returned income is not touched. In either case, once the refund does become due the Assessing Officer must make it without the company having to claim it.

Where you meet this section

In the refund that follows an appellate or other order, issued by the Assessing Officer without any claim from you; and, where the assessment was set aside, in the fresh assessment order, since the refund only becomes due when that fresh assessment is made.

The words themselves

the Assessing Officer shall, except as otherwise provided in this Act, refund the amount to the assessee without his having to make any claim in that behalf
s.435(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 435. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.