VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XIX › Section 399
Chapter XIXwas s.200A, s.206CB

Section 399 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 399 — Processing. Successor to s.200A, s.206CB of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 399 is in Chapter XIX — Collection and Recovery of Tax, which runs from section 390 to section 430.

← Section 398  ·  Section 400 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) prescribes how every statement of tax deducted or collected at source, including a correction statement, is to be processed. The amounts deductible or collectible are computed after adjusting any arithmetical error in the statement and any incorrect claim apparent from information in the statement; interest is computed on the amounts deductible or collectible as reflected in the statement; the fee, if any, is computed under section 427(1) and (2); and the amount payable by, or refundable to, the deductor or collector is then determined after setting the interest and fee against amounts already paid under section 397(3), section 398 or section 427(1) and (2), and any other amount paid by way of tax, interest or fee. An intimation stating the amount payable or refundable is prepared or generated and sent to the deductor or collector, and any refund so determined is granted to him. Sub-section (2) requires the intimation to be sent within one year from the end of the tax year in which the statement is filed, and sub-section (3) allows the Board to make a scheme for centralised processing.

Why it is there

The section gives a summary, largely automated route for checking deduction and collection statements and settling the deductor's position — what more he owes or what comes back to him — without an assessment. The adjustments allowed are deliberately narrow, confined to arithmetical errors and incorrect claims apparent from the statement itself.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Time limit for sending the intimationOne yearFrom the end of the tax year in which the statement is filed — measured from the filing, not from the year of deduction399(2)

What this means in practice

Once a statement goes in, expect an intimation quantifying what is payable or refundable, and expect it within one year of the end of the tax year of filing. The processing can only correct arithmetical errors and incorrect claims apparent from the statement, so a substantive dispute is not resolved at this stage. Interest is computed on the amounts deductible or collectible as they appear in the statement, which means an error in the statement itself carries straight into the interest figure — filing a correction statement is the way to fix it, and correction statements are themselves processed under this section. Anything already paid under section 397(3), section 398 or section 427(1) and (2), and any other tax, interest or fee paid, is set off before the final figure is struck.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A deductor files a statement of tax deducted at source in which an arithmetical error understates the amount deductible by Rs. 4 lakh. Processing corrects that error and any incorrect claim apparent from the statement, computes interest on the amounts deductible as reflected in the statement, adds the late-filing fee computed under section 427(1) and (2) — this section fixes no fee of its own — and sets off what has already been paid under section 397(3) or 398 before striking the balance. The intimation must be sent within one year from the end of the tax year in which the statement was filed, so a statement filed in the tax year ending 31 March 2026 cannot be processed under this section after 31 March 2027. Nothing beyond an arithmetical error or an apparent incorrect claim can be touched here; a substantive correction has to come through a correction statement, which is itself processed the same way.

Where you meet this section

As the intimation under clause (1)(e) specifying the amount payable by, or refundable to, the deductor or collector, and as the refund granted under clause (f). The section names no form; processing is contemplated to run through the Board's centralised scheme under sub-section (3).

The words themselves

The intimation under this section shall be sent within one year from the end of the tax year in which the statement is filed.
Section 399(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 399. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.