VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVIII › Section 385
Chapter XVIIIwas s.245RR

Section 385 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 385 — Appellate authority not to proceed in certain cases. Successor to s.245RR of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 385 is in Chapter XVIII — Appeals Revisions and Alternate Dispute Resolutions, which runs from section 356 to section 389.

← Section 384  ·  Section 386 →

What this section does

The section is a bar on parallel decision. No income-tax authority and no Appellate Tribunal shall proceed to decide any issue for which an application has been made by an applicant, being a resident, under section 383(1) — that is, an application for an advance ruling stating the question on which the ruling is sought.

Why it is there

An advance ruling is worth having only if the same question is not simultaneously being decided somewhere else. The section holds back the ordinary machinery on that question once a resident applicant has put it before the advance ruling process, so that two authorities do not decide the same issue at once.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

The bar is issue-specific, not proceeding-wide. What is stopped is deciding "any issue for which an application has been made" — the rest of an assessment or an appeal is not frozen, and other issues in the same proceeding may go on. It is also confined by who applied: the words are "an applicant, being a resident", so an application by someone who is not a resident does not engage this section. Finally it names its addressees — income-tax authorities and the Appellate Tribunal — and no one else; the High Court and the Supreme Court are not among them.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A resident company applies under section 383(1) for a ruling on whether a particular receipt is taxable, and the same question is live in an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal cannot decide that issue while the application stands, but nothing prevents it from deciding the other grounds in the same appeal, and nothing prevents the Assessing Officer from continuing with the parts of the assessment that do not turn on that question.

Where you meet this section

You meet it as the reason an assessment or an appeal is left part-decided: it is cited to an Assessing Officer, a Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal to hold back one issue while the advance ruling application on it is on foot.

The words themselves

No income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal shall proceed to decide any issue for which an application has been made by an applicant, being a resident, under section 383(1).
Section 385, Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.