VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVIII › Section 378
Chapter XVIIIwas s.264

Section 378 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 378 — Revision of other orders. Successor to s.264 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 378 is in Chapter XVIII — Appeals Revisions and Alternate Dispute Resolutions, which runs from section 356 to section 389.

← Section 377  ·  Section 379 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) gives the Competent Authority power, for any order other than one to which section 377 applies passed by an authority subordinate to him, either of his own motion or on an application by the assessee for revision, to call for the record of the proceeding in which the order was passed, to make or cause an inquiry to be made, and, subject to the provisions of the Act, to pass such order as he thinks fit, not being an order prejudicial to the assessee.

Sub-section (2) bars a revision on his own motion where the order was made more than one year previously. Sub-section (3) requires an application by the assessee to be made within one year from the date on which the order was communicated to him or the date on which he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier. Sub-section (4) allows the Competent Authority to admit a late application if satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from making it in time.

Sub-section (5) bars revision in three situations: where an appeal against the order lies to the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal but has not been made and the time for it has not expired; where such an appeal lies and the assessee has not waived his right of appeal; and where the order has been made the subject of such an appeal.

Sub-section (6) requires every application for revision to be accompanied by a fee of Rs. 500. Sub-section (7) requires an order on such an application to be passed within one year from the end of the financial year in which the application is made. Sub-section (8) excludes from that period the time taken in giving the assessee an opportunity to be reheard under section 244(2), and the period of a court stay ending on receipt of the certified copy of the order or injunction vacating it. Sub-section (9) extends the remaining period to sixty days where, after those exclusions, less than sixty days are left. Sub-section (10) provides that, irrespective of sub-section (7), a revision order may be passed at any time in consequence of or to give effect to a finding or direction contained in an order of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court or the Supreme Court.

Sub-section (11) defines "Competent Authority" as the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and provides that an order by the Competent Authority declining to interfere shall not be deemed to be an order prejudicial to the assessee.

Why it is there

Not every wrong order is appealable, and this section gives a taxpayer a route to a senior officer for those that are not. Its shape follows from that purpose: the power can only be used in the assessee's favour, it is closed off wherever an appeal is available and still open, and it is bounded in time at both ends so that a revision does not become a second appeal or an indefinite one.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Limit on revision by the Competent Authority of his own motionOne yearHe shall not of his own motion revise an order made more than one year previouslySub-section (2)
Time for an assessee to apply for revisionWithin one yearFrom the date the order was communicated to him or the date he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier; a late application may be admitted for sufficient cause under sub-section (4)Sub-section (3)
Fee accompanying the applicationRs. 500Every application by an assessee for revision under this sectionSub-section (6)
Time to pass an order on the applicationWithin one year from the end of the financial year in which the application is madeSubject to the exclusions in sub-section (8) and the sixty-day extension in sub-section (9); no limit at all where sub-section (10) appliesSub-section (7)
Minimum period left after exclusionsSixty daysWhere, after excluding the periods in sub-section (8), the time limit under sub-section (7) leaves less than sixty daysSub-section (9)

What this means in practice

The two one-year periods in sub-sections (2) and (3) are different things: one caps how far back the Competent Authority can reach on his own motion, the other is the assessee's own deadline, and the assessee's clock starts on communication of the order or on his coming to know of it, whichever is earlier — so knowledge acquired before formal communication shortens the period rather than lengthening it. Sub-section (5) is the practical gate: while an appeal lies and its time has not expired, or the right of appeal has not been waived, revision is not available at all, so a taxpayer must choose and, if he wants revision, waive the appeal. The relief is one-directional — sub-section (1)(c) forbids an order prejudicial to the assessee — but sub-section (11)(b) makes clear that refusing to interfere is not prejudicial, so a bare declination is not open to attack on that footing. The disposal deadline in sub-section (7) is generous in one direction only: sub-section (10) removes it altogether for an order giving effect to a finding or direction of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court or the Supreme Court.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An assessee is served with an order on 10 April 2026 and applies for revision on 20 March 2027, with the Rs. 500 fee — inside the one year allowed by sub-section (3). The application is made in the financial year 2026-27, so under sub-section (7) the Commissioner has until 31 March 2028 to pass an order on it. Had the assessee also appealed the same order to the Commissioner (Appeals), sub-section (5)(c) would have closed the revision route entirely.

Where you meet this section

You meet this as the revision application filed with the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner against an order for which no appeal is available or where the appeal right has been waived, and as the order passed on it — including an order simply declining to interfere.

The words themselves

pass such order thereon, not being an order prejudicial to the assessee, as he thinks fit
Section 378(1)(c), Income-tax Act, 2025.
within one year from the date on which the order in question was communicated to him or the date on which he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier
Section 378(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
Every application by an assessee for revision under this section shall be accompanied by a fee of Rs. 500.
Section 378(6), Income-tax Act, 2025.
an order by the Competent Authority declining to interfere shall, not be deemed to be an order prejudicial to the assessee
Section 378(11)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 378. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.