VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVIII › Section 364
Chapter XVIIIwas s.255

Section 364 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 364 — Procedure of Appellate Tribunal. Successor to s.255 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 364 is in Chapter XVIII — Appeals Revisions and Alternate Dispute Resolutions, which runs from section 356 to section 389.

← Section 363  ·  Section 365 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) vests the Appellate Tribunal's powers and functions in Benches constituted by its President from among the members. Sub-section (2) makes the ordinary Bench one Judicial Member and one accountant member, subject to sub-section (3), which allows the President, or any other member authorised in this behalf by the Central Government, sitting singly, to dispose of any case allotted to the Bench where the total income of the assessee as computed by the Assessing Officer does not exceed rupees fifty lakh. Sub-section (4) allows the President to constitute a Special Bench of three or more members for a particular case, of whom one must be a judicial member and one an accountant member.

Sub-section (5) settles differences of opinion: the point is decided by the majority, but if the members are equally divided they state the points of difference and the President refers them for hearing by one or more other members, the decision then being that of the majority of the members who have heard the case, including those who first heard it.

Sub-section (6) gives the Tribunal power, subject to the Act, to regulate its own procedure and that of its Benches, including the places at which they sit. Sub-section (7) gives it all the powers vested in the income-tax authorities referred to in section 246, deems any proceeding before it a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 229 and 267 and for the purposes of section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and deems it a Civil Court for all the purposes of section 215 and Chapter xxxvii of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Why it is there

The Tribunal decides both law and accounts, which is why the standard Bench pairs a judicial member with an accountant member and why a Special Bench must contain one of each. The single-member route keeps small cases from consuming a two-member Bench. Sub-sections (5) to (7) supply what a tribunal needs to function — a way out of a deadlock, control of its own procedure, and the powers and protections of a court.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Ceiling for a case to be disposed of by a single memberRupees fifty lakhTotal income of the assessee as computed by the Assessing Officer in the case; the member must be the President or a member authorised in this behalf by the Central GovernmentSub-section (3)
Composition of an ordinary BenchOne Judicial Member and one accountant memberSubject to sub-section (3), which allows a single member in small casesSub-section (2)
Composition of a Special BenchThree or more membersConstituted by the President for the disposal of a particular case; one must be a judicial member and one an accountant memberSub-section (4)

What this means in practice

The single-member limit is measured by the total income as computed by the Assessing Officer, so an appeal against a large addition is outside it even if the returned income was small. On a difference of opinion the majority decides; only an equal division triggers the third-member reference, and the result is then the majority of all members who have heard the case, including the two who first heard it. Sub-section (7) also gives the Tribunal the powers of the income-tax authorities in section 246 and makes it a Civil Court for section 215 and Chapter xxxvii of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An appeal is filed against an assessment in which the Assessing Officer computed total income of Rs. 45 lakh; being within the ceiling, it may be disposed of by a single member. Had the computed total income been Rs. 60 lakh it would have gone to a Bench of one Judicial Member and one accountant member, and if those two differed equally the President would refer the point to one or more other members.

Where you meet this section

You meet this section in the constitution of the Bench that hears your appeal — single member, division Bench or Special Bench — and in a third-member order following an equal division.

The words themselves

may sitting singly, dispose of any case allotted to the Bench, pertaining to an assessee whose total income as computed by the Assessing Officer in the case does not exceed rupees fifty lakh
Section 364(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
if the members are equally divided, they shall state the point or points on which they differ, and the case shall be referred by the President of the Appellate Tribunal for hearing on such point or points by one or more of the other members
Section 364(5), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.