VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVII › Section 331
Chapter XVIIwas s.167C

Section 331 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 331 — Liability of partners of limited liability partnership in liquidation. Successor to s.167C of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 331 is in Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons, which runs from section 302 to section 355.

← Section 330  ·  Section 332 →

What this section does

The section makes every person who was a partner of a limited liability partnership at any time during the relevant tax year jointly and severally liable for tax due, notwithstanding anything in the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008. It operates where any tax, including penalty, interest, fee or any other sum payable under the Act, is due and cannot be recovered from the limited liability partnership in respect of any income of any tax year, or from any other person in respect of income of a tax year during which that other person was a limited liability partnership. The liability does not attach if the partner proves that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the limited liability partnership.

Why it is there

Limited liability is the point of the vehicle, and without an express override a partner would be beyond reach for the entity's tax however the shortfall arose. The section pierces that only for the Act's own dues, and only after recovery from the entity has failed, so it is a collection provision of last resort. The defence keeps it aimed at partners whose conduct explains the non-recovery rather than at every name on the register.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

Two conditions must be satisfied before a partner is reached: the sum must be due, and it must be one that cannot be recovered from the limited liability partnership or the other person in clause (b). The liability then covers penalty, interest, fee and any other sum payable under the Act, not just tax, and is joint and several, so the whole amount may be recovered from any one partner. Exposure turns on membership at any time during the relevant tax year, so resigning before the demand was raised does not help. The defence puts the burden on the partner and is framed negatively. Note also that although the heading speaks of liquidation, the operative words apply wherever the sum is due and cannot be recovered.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A limited liability partnership is assessed to tax, interest and penalty of Rs. 90 lakh and the amount cannot be recovered from it. Two persons were partners at some point during that tax year, one of whom retired part-way through. Both are within the section and each is jointly and severally liable for the whole Rs. 90 lakh. The retired partner escapes only if he proves that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part.

Where you meet this section

You meet this section as a recovery proceeding directed at you personally after the limited liability partnership's demand has gone unpaid. It is not a filing or assessment provision; it surfaces at the collection stage.

The words themselves

Irrespective of anything contained in the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009)
Section 331, Income-tax Act, 2025.
every such person who was a partner of such limited liability partnership at any time during the relevant tax year, shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of such tax due unless he proves that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part
Section 331, Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 331. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.