VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XIII › Section 202
Chapter XIIIwas s.115BAC

Section 202 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 202 — New tax regime for individuals, Hindu undivided family and others. Successor to s.115BAC of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 202 is in Chapter XIII — Determination of Tax in Special Cases, which runs from section 190 to section 235.

← Section 201  ·  Section 203 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) makes the rate Table the default basis of charge for an individual, a Hindu undivided family, an association of persons other than a co-operative society, a body of individuals whether incorporated or not, and an artificial juridical person referred to in section 2(77)(g). It operates irrespective of anything else in the Act other than Chapter XVII-B, but subject to Parts A, B, E and this Part of the Chapter, and applies unless the person exercises the option in the manner provided under sub-section (4). The Table: nil up to Rs 4,00,000; 5% from Rs 4,00,001 to Rs 8,00,000; 10% to Rs 12,00,000; 15% to Rs 16,00,000; 20% to Rs 20,00,000; 25% to Rs 24,00,000; and 30% above Rs 24,00,000.

Sub-section (2) is the price of those rates. Clause (a) computes total income without exemption or deduction under Schedule III (Table: Sl. Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 or 17), Schedule III (Table: Sl. Nos. 12 or 13) other than those as may be prescribed, section 19(1) (Table: Sl. No. 1), section 22(1)(b) for properties referred to in section 21(6), section 33(8), sections 48, 49, 45(3)(a), (b) or (c), 46, 47(1)(a), and Chapter VIII other than sections 124(1), 124(2), 125(2) and 146; sub-clause (iii), which listed section 144, was omitted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026 and now stands blank. Clause (b) bars set-off of a carried forward loss or depreciation from an earlier year attributable to any of those deductions, and of a house property loss against any other head; clause (c) bars exemption or deduction for allowances or perquisites provided under any other law in force. Sub-section (3) deems the loss and depreciation denied by clause (b) to have been given full effect to, with no further deduction in any later year.

Sub-section (4) is the opt-out. For a person with business or profession income the option must be exercised on or before the section 263(1) due date; once exercised it applies to subsequent tax years; it may be withdrawn only once, for a tax year other than the one for which it was exercised; and after withdrawal the person is never again eligible to exercise it, except where he ceases to have business or profession income. For a person without such income, the option is exercised along with the return furnished under section 263(1). Sub-section (5) keeps the section 147 deduction available to a Unit in the International Financial Services Centre on fulfilment of the conditions in that section.

Why it is there

The Table is graded low enough to be made the default, and paid for by stripping out the exemptions, deductions, allowances and loss set-offs listed in sub-section (2). Making it the default rather than an election reverses the burden: a person wanting the ordinary route has to say so, in time and in the prescribed manner. The one-way ratchet in sub-section (4)(a) stops a business assessee choosing afresh each year to suit the numbers.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Rate on total income up to Rs 4,00,000NilPerson covered by sub-section (1) who has not exercised the sub-section (4) optionSub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 1
Rate on the next band5%From Rs 4,00,001 to Rs 8,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 2
Rate on the next band10%From Rs 8,00,001 to Rs 12,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 3
Rate on the next band15%From Rs 12,00,001 to Rs 16,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 4
Rate on the next band20%From Rs 16,00,001 to Rs 20,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 5
Rate on the next band25%From Rs 20,00,001 to Rs 24,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 6
Top rate30%Total income above Rs 24,00,000Sub-section (1), Table Sl. No. 7
Deadline for the option where there is business or profession incomeOn or before the due date specified under section 263(1) for that tax yearOnce exercised, it applies to subsequent tax yearsSub-section (4)(a)(i) and (ii)
Number of times the option may be withdrawnOnce onlyFor a person with business or profession income, and for a tax year other than the one for which it was exercised; after withdrawal it is never again available unless such income ceasesSub-section (4)(a)(iii) and (iv)
Timing of the option where there is no business or profession incomeAlong with the return of income furnished under section 263(1)No carry-forward or withdrawal restriction is stated for this classSub-section (4)(b)

What this means in practice

Because this is the default, the risk lies in inaction rather than in choosing. A person with business or profession income who wants ordinary rates must exercise the option on or before the section 263(1) due date, and the choice then becomes near-permanent — withdrawal is allowed once, and after it the option is gone unless business or profession income ceases. Sub-section (3) is the part most easily missed: the loss and depreciation clause (2)(b) refuses are deemed to have been given full effect to, so they are extinguished rather than held over for a year in which the option might be exercised. On the other side, Chapter VIII is not wholly lost — sections 124(1), 124(2), 125(2) and 146 survive — and section 144 came off the denied list when Act No. 4 of 2026 omitted sub-clause (2)(a)(iii).

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual with total income of Rs 18,00,000 and no business income is taxed under the Table unless she opts out: nil on the first Rs 4,00,000, 5% on the next Rs 4,00,000, 10% on the next, 15% on the next and 20% on the remaining Rs 2,00,000 — Rs 1,60,000, subject to Parts A, B, E and this Part of the Chapter. In arriving at the Rs 18,00,000 she gets none of the deductions listed in sub-section (2)(a), and a house property loss cannot be set against her salary under clause (b)(ii) — nor carried forward, because sub-section (3) deems it fully given effect to. Having no business income she may exercise the option along with each year's return; a person with business income who withdraws it once can never exercise it again while that income continues.

Where you meet this section

You meet it as the tax computation on the face of nearly every individual and Hindu undivided family return, because it is the default. You also meet it as the option exercised under sub-section (4), and as the disallowance of Chapter VIII deductions in an intimation or assessment where the option was not validly exercised.

The words themselves

shall, unless the person exercises the option in the manner provided under sub-section (4), be computed at the rate of tax given in the following Table
Section 202(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
The loss and depreciation referred to in sub-section (2)(b) shall be deemed to have been given full effect to and no further deduction for such loss or depreciation shall be allowed for any subsequent year.
Section 202(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
after such withdrawal, the person shall never be eligible to exercise the option under this sub-section, except where such person ceases to have any income from business or profession
Section 202(4)(a)(iv), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 202. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 202. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.