VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter X › Section 177
Chapter Xwas s.94B

Section 177 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 177 — Limitation on interest deduction in certain cases. Successor to s.94B of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 177 is in Chapter X — Special Provisions Relating to Avoidance of Tax, which runs from section 161 to section 177.

← Section 176  ·  Section 178 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) disallows, irrespective of anything to the contrary in the Act, interest or similar payment in respect of "excess interest" under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession", where it is paid or payable by an Indian company or the Indian permanent establishment of a foreign company on debt issued by a non-resident associated enterprise, and the sum of that expenditure in the tax year exceeds one crore rupees.

Sub-section (2) extends the reach to third-party lending: where the lender is not an associated enterprise, the debt is deemed to have been issued by one if an associated enterprise has given the lender an implicit or explicit guarantee in respect of it, or has deposited corresponding and matching funds with that lender.

Sub-section (3) carves out interest on debt issued by a lender that is a permanent establishment in India of a non-resident engaged in banking, and takes the section off an Indian company or Indian permanent establishment of a foreign company engaged in banking or insurance, a Finance Company located in an International Financial Services Centre, and notified classes of non-banking financial companies.

Sub-section (4) defines "excess interest" as the lower of the total interest paid or payable in excess of 30% of the borrower's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation for the tax year, and the interest paid or payable to associated enterprises for that year. Sub-section (5) carries interest not wholly deducted forward and allows it against the profits and gains of any business or profession assessable for a later year, to the extent of the maximum allowable interest expenditure under sub-section (4); sub-section (6) caps the carry forward at eight tax years immediately succeeding the year for which the excess interest was first computed. Sub-section (7) defines "debt", defines "Finance Company" by reference to the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Finance Company) Regulations, 2021, and takes "permanent establishment" from section 173(c).

Why it is there

Interest is deductible while dividends are not, so a group can strip profits out of an Indian company by funding it with related-party debt instead of equity. The section caps the deduction by reference to the borrower's own operating earnings, and sub-section (2) closes the obvious escape of borrowing from an unrelated bank against a group guarantee or matching deposit. The one crore threshold keeps small borrowings out and the eight-year carry forward stops the disallowance being permanent.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Threshold for the section to apply at allMore than one crore rupeesThe sum of the interest or similar expenditure in the tax year, paid or payable in respect of debt issued by a non-resident associated enterpriseSub-section (1)(b)
Earnings-based limb of "excess interest"30% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisationTotal interest paid or payable in excess of that 30% of the borrower's ebitda for the tax yearSub-section (4)
Associated enterprise limb of "excess interest"The interest paid or payable to associated enterprises for the tax year"Excess interest" is whichever of the two limbs is lessSub-section (4)
Carry forward of disallowed interestEight tax yearsImmediately succeeding the tax year for which the excess interest expenditure was first computed; each year's set off is limited by sub-section (4)Sub-section (6)

What this means in practice

Sub-section (4) is a "whichever is less" test and both limbs must be computed before anything is disallowed; where related-party interest is small but total borrowing is heavy, the second limb keeps the disallowance down. The one crore figure is an entry test on the associated-enterprise interest, not a deductible slice. A guarantee alone converts a bank loan into associated-enterprise debt, and it may be implicit. Carried-forward interest is allowed only within a later year's own sub-section (4) ceiling, and dies after eight tax years.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An Indian company has ebitda of Rs. 100 crore and total interest of Rs. 45 crore, of which Rs. 20 crore is paid to a non-resident associated enterprise. Thirty per cent of ebitda is Rs. 30 crore, so total interest exceeds that by Rs. 15 crore, against associated enterprise interest of Rs. 20 crore. Excess interest is the lower figure, Rs. 15 crore, which is disallowed and may be carried forward for up to eight tax years; the section applies because the associated enterprise interest exceeds one crore rupees.

Where you meet this section

You meet it as a disallowance in the computation of business income and, if contested, as an addition in an assessment order in a group financing case — sometimes on an unrelated bank loan, where sub-section (2) is invoked on the strength of a parent's guarantee.

The words themselves

"excess interest" means the total interest paid or payable in excess of 30% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation of the borrower in the tax year or the interest paid or payable to associated enterprises for that tax year, whichever is less
Section 177(4), Income-tax Act, 2025.
shall not be carried forward for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the excess interest expenditure was first computed
Section 177(6), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 177. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 177. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.