VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter X › Section 163
Chapter Xwas s.92B

Section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 163 — Meaning of international transaction. Successor to s.92B of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 163 is in Chapter X — Special Provisions Relating to Avoidance of Tax, which runs from section 161 to section 177.

← Section 162  ·  Section 164 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) defines an international transaction for the whole of Chapter X as a transaction between two or more associated enterprises of which at least one is necessarily a non-resident, and then lists seven inclusive categories: dealings in tangible property; dealings in intangible property; capital financing, lending or borrowing (including guarantees, marketable securities and any advance, deferred payment or receivable arising in business); provision of services; a transaction of business restructuring or reorganisation, expressly whether or not it bears on profits, income, losses or assets at the time or at any future date; cost allocation, apportionment or contribution arrangements between associated enterprises; and a residual limb covering any other transaction having a bearing on profits, income, losses or assets. Sub-section (2) deems a transaction with an unrelated person to be an international transaction between associated enterprises where there is a prior agreement in relation to it between that person and the associated enterprise, or the terms are determined in substance between them, provided the enterprise or the associated enterprise or both are non-residents — and it does not matter whether the other person is a non-resident. Sub-section (3) expands "intangible property" over twelve heads, from marketing, technology, artistic, data processing and engineering intangibles through customer, contract, human capital, location and goodwill related assets, to a residual clause for anything deriving its value from its intellectual content rather than its physical attributes.

Why it is there

The definition fixes the perimeter of the transfer pricing regime, and it is drafted inclusively so that new forms of dealing between associated enterprises are not left outside. Sub-section (2) closes the obvious route around it — routing the transaction through an unconnected intermediary while the associated enterprise still sets the terms — and sub-section (3) forestalls the argument that something like a customer list, a trained workforce or goodwill is not intangible property.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

Screening a group's dealings means testing each of them against seven inclusive limbs, not against a closed list — and clause (g) sweeps in anything else that bears on profits, income, losses or assets. Business restructurings need to be documented even where nothing appears to shift at the time, because clause (e) applies irrespective of any bearing on profit, income, losses or assets then or in future. Third-party contracts are not automatically safe: if a prior agreement exists with the associated enterprise, or the associated enterprise in substance sets the terms, sub-section (2) treats the third-party transaction as an international transaction, with residence tested on the enterprise and the associated enterprise rather than on the third party. When mapping intangibles, work from the twelve heads in sub-section (3) rather than from the shorter list in clause (1)(b).

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An Indian company sells components to an unconnected distributor abroad, but the price, volumes and credit period were settled in advance between that distributor and the company's non-resident parent. Sub-section (2) deems that sale to be an international transaction between two associated enterprises: what matters is that the enterprise or the associated enterprise is a non-resident, and the distributor's own residence is irrelevant. A sale that looks like a third-party sale is therefore drawn into Chapter X and its price must be tested at arm's length. A group business reorganisation carried out in the same year is caught too, under clause (e), even though it has no bearing on profits, income, losses or assets either at the time or at any future date.

Where you meet this section

You rarely meet section 163 by name; you meet it through the machinery it feeds — the accountant's report under section 172, the information and documents required under section 171, a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer under section 166, and any arm's length adjustment under section 165, each of which applies only if the dealing falls inside this definition.

The words themselves

"international transaction" means a transaction between two or more associated enterprises, one of which is necessarily a non-resident
Section 163(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 163. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.