VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter IX › Section 160
Chapter IXwas s.91

Section 160 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 160 — Countries with which no agreement exists. Successor to s.91 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 160 is in Chapter IX — Rebates and Reliefs, which runs from section 155 to section 160.

← Section 159  ·  Section 161 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) gives unilateral double taxation relief to a person resident in India. If he proves that on income which accrued or arose outside India during the tax year, and which is not deemed to accrue or arise in India, he has paid income-tax by deduction or otherwise under the law of a country with which there is no agreement under section 159, he is entitled to a deduction from the Indian income-tax payable of a sum calculated on that doubly taxed income — at the Indian rate of tax or the rate of tax of that country, whichever is lower, or at the Indian rate where both are equal.

Sub-section (2) extends the same relief to a non-resident assessed on his share in the income of a registered firm assessed as resident in India, where that share includes such foreign income and he proves the foreign tax paid.

Sub-section (3) defines four terms. "Income-tax" in relation to a country includes excess profits tax or business profits tax charged by the Government of any part of that country or a local authority there. "Indian income-tax" is income-tax charged as per this Act. The "Indian rate of tax" is Indian income-tax, after any relief due under the Act but before any relief due under this Part, divided by the total income. The "rate of tax of the said country" is income-tax and super-tax actually paid there, after all relief due there but before any relief there for double taxation, divided by the whole amount of the income as assessed there.

Why it is there

Where a treaty exists relief flows from the treaty; where none does, foreign income of a resident would bear tax twice with nothing to correct it. The section supplies relief unilaterally but measures it by the lower of two effective rates rather than by the foreign tax bill, so India does not fund a foreign country's higher rate. The definitions matter as much as the operative rule, because both rates are effective rates worked out by division, not headline rates.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Rate at which relief is computedThe lower of the Indian rate of tax and the rate of tax of the said countryApplied to the doubly taxed income; where both rates are equal, the Indian rate appliesSub-section (1)(a) and (b); the same in sub-section (2)(a) and (b)
"Indian rate of tax"Indian income-tax, after deduction of any relief due under this Act but before deduction of any relief due under this Part, divided by the total incomeAn effective rate, not the slab or headline rateSub-section (3)(c)
"Rate of tax of the said country"Income-tax and super-tax actually paid there after all relief due there but before any relief for double taxation, divided by the whole income as assessed thereMeasured on tax actually paid, not on the country's statutory rateSub-section (3)(d)

What this means in practice

Relief is a rate exercise, not a reimbursement: the sum is calculated on the doubly taxed income at the lower of two effective rates, so foreign tax above the Indian rate is a real cost that is never recovered. Both rates are effective rates arrived at by division under sub-section (3)(c) and (d), which is why the answer often differs from a comparison of headline rates. The section is available only where the country has no section 159 agreement with India, and only on proof — the person must prove both the foreign accrual and the tax paid — and income deemed to accrue or arise in India stays outside it whatever a foreign country charged.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual resident in India earns Rs 20 lakh in a country with which India has no section 159 agreement and pays tax there amounting, on the sub-section (3)(d) computation, to an effective 12%. If his Indian rate of tax under sub-section (3)(c) is 18%, relief is given at the lower rate — 12% of the Rs 20 lakh, Rs 2.4 lakh — deducted from the Indian income-tax payable. If his Indian rate were 9%, relief would be Rs 1.8 lakh and the excess foreign tax would simply not be recovered.

Where you meet this section

In the foreign tax relief claim made in a resident's return, backed by proof of the foreign income and the foreign tax paid, and in the assessment where that proof is tested. It also surfaces in the assessment of a non-resident partner taxed on a share in a registered firm assessed as resident in India.

The words themselves

at the Indian rate of tax or the rate of tax of the said country, whichever is the lower
Section 160(1)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.
"Indian rate of tax" means the rate determined by dividing Indian income-tax after deduction of any relief due under the provisions of this Act but before deduction of any relief due under this Part, by the total income
Section 160(3)(c), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 160. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 160. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.