VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter VIII › Section 148
Chapter VIIIwas s.80M

Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 148 — Deduction in respect of certain inter-corporate dividends. Successor to s.80M of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 148 is in Chapter VIII — Deductions to Be Made in Computing Total Income, which runs from section 122 to section 154.

← Section 147  ·  Section 149 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) applies where the gross total income of a domestic company includes dividend income from another domestic company, from a foreign company or from a business trust. It allows that company a deduction equal to so much of that dividend income as does not exceed the dividend it has itself distributed at least one month before the due date for filing its return of income under section 263(1). Sub-section (2) provides that once an amount of distributed dividend has been used to support a deduction in one tax year, no deduction can be claimed in respect of the same amount in any other tax year.

Why it is there

The provision removes the second layer of tax on a dividend that a company merely passes through, but only to the extent it actually passes it through, and only if it does so before the return deadline. Sub-section (2) prevents the same onward distribution being counted twice across years.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Deadline for the company's own distribution to countAt least one month before the due date for filing the return of income under section 263(1)A distribution made later than that, even if before the due date itself, does not support the deduction148(1)
Amount of the deductionSo much of the dividend income as does not exceed the dividend distributed by the companyThe onward distribution, not the dividend received, sets the ceiling148(1)

What this means in practice

The deduction is the smaller of the dividend received and the dividend the company itself declares and distributes, and it is lost to the extent the company retains the money. The distribution has to be a clear month ahead of the section 263(1) due date, so the decision to distribute cannot be left until the return is being prepared. Keep track of which distribution has been set against which year's dividend income: sub-section (2) prevents the same distributed amount being used again in another year.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A domestic company receives a dividend of Rs. 5 crore from another domestic company and itself distributes Rs. 3 crore to its shareholders two months before the due date for its return under section 263(1). The deduction is Rs. 3 crore, not Rs. 5 crore — sub-section (1) caps it at the amount the company has itself distributed, so Rs. 2 crore of the receipt stays taxable. Had that same Rs. 3 crore gone out a fortnight before the due date, it would have been inside the due date but outside the section, which requires distribution at least one month before it. And once the Rs. 3 crore has supported a deduction in this year, sub-section (2) shuts it out of any other tax year.

Where you meet this section

In the domestic company’s return, as a deduction against dividend income included in gross total income, and in the assessment that checks the date and amount of its own declared dividend against the section 263(1) due date. Because the qualifying distribution must precede that due date by a month, the deduction is effectively settled before the return is filed rather than argued afterwards.

The words themselves

as does not exceed the amount of dividend distributed by it at least one month before the due date for filing the return of income under section 263(1)
Section 148(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 148. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.