Rule 325 — Arrangements for winding up, etc., of business.
Where the trade or undertaking of the employer is to be wound up or discontinued, the trustees shall, with the prior approval of the approving authority and subject to such conditions as it may impose, make satisfactory arrangements for the payment of gratuity to the existing beneficiaries.
Winding up the employer's business is the point at which a gratuity fund's beneficiaries are most exposed, because the source of contributions ends. The rule puts a positive duty on the trustees at that moment and makes it answerable to the approving authority in advance, so the arrangements are settled before the business goes rather than tested afterwards.
The duty is the trustees' and it is prospective — it attaches where the trade or undertaking is to be wound up or discontinued, not only once it has been. Approval must come first: the rule requires the prior approval of the approving authority, so arrangements made and then submitted do not answer it, and the authority may impose conditions the trustees must observe. What counts as satisfactory is for that authority, and the arrangements are for the existing beneficiaries, so the rule looks to those already entitled rather than to future employees.
An employer decides to discontinue its manufacturing undertaking. Before that happens, the trustees of its gratuity fund put proposed arrangements for paying gratuity to the existing beneficiaries to the approving authority, obtain its approval, and give effect to them subject to the conditions imposed.
You meet it at the closure of a business, in the trustees' application to the approving authority and in the approval and conditions under which the fund's obligations to existing beneficiaries are settled.
the trustees shall, with the prior approval of, and subject to such conditions as may be imposed by, approving authority, make satisfactory arrangements for the payment of gratuity to the existing beneficiaries