VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 320
Rules 2026

Rule 320 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 320 — Admission of directors to a fund.

Where this rule sits

← Rule 319  ·  Rule 321 →

What this rule does

The rule limits the admission of directors to the benefits of a fund. Where the employer is a company as defined in section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, a director of the company may be admitted to the benefits of the fund only if he is a whole time bona fide employee of the company and does not beneficially own shares in the company carrying more than 5% of the total voting power.

Both conditions must be met, and the shareholding test is on beneficial ownership measured by voting power.

Why it is there

A fund exists for employees, and a director may be an employee in name only or may be, in substance, the company's owner. Either way the benefits of the fund could be directed to the person who controls the employer. The rule admits a director only where he is a whole time bona fide employee, which excludes the nominal or non-executive director, and only where his beneficial shareholding carries not more than 5% of the total voting power, which excludes the controlling owner.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Maximum beneficial shareholding of an admitted directorNot more than 5% of the total voting powerShares in the company beneficially owned by the director; measured by voting power, not by number or value of sharesRule 320

What this means in practice

Two independent tests have to be satisfied at once, and failing either keeps the director out. "Whole time bona fide employee" is not answered by a service agreement alone, and the second test is set in terms of beneficial ownership and voting power, so shares held through a nominee count against the director while non-voting holdings do not carry the same weight. The 5% figure is a limit rather than a qualification: at or below it the first test still has to be met. The rule governs admission to the benefits of the fund; it says nothing about a director who was validly admitted and later crosses the shareholding line, and nothing about non-director employees, who are outside it altogether.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company's managing director works full time for the company and beneficially owns shares carrying 4% of its total voting power. He may be admitted to the benefits of the fund, both conditions being met. Another director attends board meetings but holds no executive position; he fails the whole time bona fide employee test and cannot be admitted, whatever his shareholding. A third director works full time but beneficially owns, partly through a nominee, shares carrying 9% of the total voting power, and is outside the rule.

Where you meet this rule

A company meets it when the trustees consider admitting a director to the fund, and in the declarations of shareholding and employment taken at that point.

The words themselves

a director of the company may be admitted to the benefits of the fund only if he is a whole time bona fide employee of the company and does not beneficially own shares in the company carrying more than 5% of the total voting power
Rule 320, Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.