Rule 266 — Procedure if no Inquiry Officer appointed.
The rule provides that the procedure prescribed in rules 264 and 265 shall also apply, to the extent possible, to the prescribed authority if it itself conducts the inquiry without appointing an Inquiry Officer.
Rules 264 and 265 lay down how proceedings before an Inquiry Officer are conducted and how the prescribed authority's order is made, on the assumption that an Inquiry Officer has been appointed. Where the prescribed authority holds the inquiry itself, that assumption fails and the procedural protections would otherwise fall away. The rule carries them across so the person under inquiry is dealt with the same way either route is taken.
The absence of an Inquiry Officer does not lower the procedure: rules 264 and 265 apply to the prescribed authority conducting the inquiry itself. The qualification is "to the extent possible", which accommodates the steps in those rules that assume two separate functionaries and cannot operate when one person does both, but it does not license departure from the rest.
In an inquiry into the conduct of an authorised income-tax practitioner where the prescribed authority holds the inquiry itself rather than appointing an Inquiry Officer.
The procedure prescribed in rules 264 and 265 shall also apply, to the extent possible, to the prescribed authority, if it itself conducts the inquiry without appointing an Inquiry Officer.