VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 194
Rules 2026s.375

Rule 194 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 194 — Declaration under section 375. Made under s.375 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Where this rule sits

Rule 194 gives effect to Section 375 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. A rule cannot go beyond the section it serves: where the two seem to differ, the section governs.

← Rule 193  ·  Rule 195 →

What this rule does

The rule prescribes the form, the verification, the signatory and the number of copies of the declaration referred to in section 375(1).

Sub-rule (1) requires the declaration to be in Form No. 117 and to be verified in the manner indicated in that Form. Sub-rule (2) requires the declaration and the verification to be signed by the person specified in rule 167(3). Sub-rule (3) fixes the number of copies according to the forum: where the declaration is furnished to the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals) it shall be in duplicate, and where it is furnished to the Appellate Tribunal it shall be in triplicate.

Why it is there

Section 375(1) provides for a declaration but leaves its shape open. The rule fixes the form and its verification so that the same particulars are affirmed in every case, borrows the signing rules that already apply under rule 167(3) rather than writing a second set, and settles the practical question of how many copies each appellate forum needs.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Copies of the declaration for the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals)DuplicateWhere the declaration is furnished to either of those authoritiesSub-rule (3)(a)
Copies of the declaration for the Appellate TribunalTriplicateWhere the declaration is furnished to the Appellate TribunalSub-rule (3)(b)

The forms it prescribes

What this means in practice

Three requirements have to be met together and a declaration failing any of them is not in order: it must be in Form No. 117, verified in the manner indicated in the Form, and signed by the person specified in rule 167(3). Who that person is is not stated here — the rule points to rule 167(3), and the signatory therefore changes with the class of assessee. The number of copies follows the forum and not the subject matter: two for the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals), three for the Appellate Tribunal.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company furnishing the section 375(1) declaration in an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) files Form No. 117 in duplicate, verified in the manner indicated in the Form and signed by the person specified in rule 167(3) for a company. If the same declaration were to be furnished before the Appellate Tribunal, three copies would be required.

Where you meet this rule

You meet it in appellate proceedings, at the point where the section 375(1) declaration is filed with the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal.

The words themselves

The declaration referred to in section 375(1) shall be in Form No. 117, and shall be verified in the manner indicated therein.
Rule 194(1), Income-tax Rules, 2026.
The declaration and the verification referred to in sub-rule (1) shall be signed by the person specified in rule 167(3).
Rule 194(2), Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.