VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 16
Rules 2026s.17

Rule 16 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 16 — Annual accretion referred to in section 17(1)(i). Made under s.17 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Where this rule sits

Rule 16 gives effect to Section 17 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. A rule cannot go beyond the section it serves: where the two seem to differ, the section governs.

← Rule 15  ·  Rule 17 →

What this rule does

Sub-rule (1) prescribes the formula for the annual accretion referred to in section 17(1)(i) — the interest, dividend or any other amount of a similar nature accruing during the tax year to the balance to the credit of the fund or scheme referred to in section 17(1)(h). The taxable perquisite is tp = (pc/2) × R + (PC1 + TP1) × R.

The rule defines each term. Tp is the taxable perquisite under section 17(1)(i) for the current tax year. TP1 is the aggregate of taxable perquisite under section 17(1)(i) for the tax year or years commencing on or after the 1st April, 2020 other than the current tax year. Pc is the aggregate amount of principal contribution made by the employer in excess of Rs. 750000 to the specified fund or scheme during the tax year, and PC1 is the same aggregate for the tax year or years commencing on or after the 1st April, 2020 other than the current tax year. R is I divided by F(avg.), where I is the aggregate amount of income accrued during the current tax year in the specified fund or scheme account, and F(avg.) is the opening balance to the credit of the fund or scheme on the first day of the current tax year plus the closing balance on the last day, divided by two.

Sub-rule (2) adds two definitional points: "specified fund or scheme" means a fund or scheme referred to in section 17(1)(h); and where the aggregate of TP1 and PC1 exceeds the aggregate balance to the credit of the specified fund or scheme on the first day of the current tax year, the excess is ignored in computing that aggregate.

Why it is there

Section 17(1)(h) brings the employer's contribution beyond a limit into the employee's hands, and section 17(1)(i) goes further and taxes the accretion on that already-taxed excess. The Act does not say how to isolate the earnings attributable to the excess contribution from the earnings of the whole fund balance, so the rule supplies an apportionment. R is the fund's own rate of return for the year, applied to the current year's excess contribution taken at half — reflecting that it accrues through the year — and to the whole of the earlier excess contributions and the accretion already taxed on them.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Employer contribution threshold above which the contribution enters pc and PC1Rs. 750000Aggregate principal contribution by the employer to the specified fund or scheme; only the excess over this amount is takenSub-rule (1), definitions of pc and PC1
Earliest tax years taken into TP1 and PC1Tax year or years commencing on or after the 1st April, 2020Other than the current tax yearSub-rule (1), definitions of TP1 and PC1
Weight given to the current year's excess contributionOne-half (pc/2)Applies to the current tax year's excess contribution only; earlier years' PC1 is taken in fullSub-rule (1), formula
F(avg.)Opening plus closing balance, divided by twoBalance to the credit of the specified fund or scheme on the first day and on the last day of the current tax yearSub-rule (1), definition of F(avg.)

What this means in practice

The perquisite is not the fund's income; it is the fund's rate of return applied to the excess contributions. R is computed from the fund's own figures for the year, so an employee cannot substitute a declared interest rate for I divided by F(avg.). The current year's excess enters at half its value while every earlier year's excess since the tax year commencing on or after 1st April, 2020 enters in full, along with the perquisite already taxed on it, which is why the charge compounds year on year. Sub-rule (2)(b) is the only relief in the formula: where TP1 and PC1 together exceed the opening balance of the fund, the excess is ignored, so the taxable base can never exceed what is actually standing to the employee's credit at the start of the year.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

An employer contributes Rs. 10,00,000 in the tax year to a specified fund for an employee, so pc is Rs. 2,50,000 — the excess over Rs. 750000. Earlier excess contributions since the year commencing 1st April, 2020 total Rs. 4,00,000 (PC1) and perquisite already taxed on them totals Rs. 40,000 (TP1). If income accrued in the fund for the year is Rs. 1,20,000 and the average of the opening and closing balances is Rs. 20,00,000, R is 0.06, and tp is (2,50,000/2) × 0.06 plus (4,40,000) × 0.06, that is Rs. 7,500 plus Rs. 26,400, or Rs. 33,900.

Where you meet this rule

In the perquisite figure shown in the salary statement and in the return of income; an employee normally meets it as a line in the employer's computation of taxable salary rather than as a rule applied by hand.

The words themselves

TP = (PC/2) × R + (PC1 + TP1) × R
Rule 16(1), Income-tax Rules, 2026.
PC = aggregate amount of principal contribution made by the employer in excess of Rs. 750000 to the specified fund or scheme during the tax year
Rule 16(1), Income-tax Rules, 2026.
where the aggregate amount of TP1 and PC1 exceed the aggregate amount of balance to the credit of the specified fund or scheme on the first day of the current tax year, then the excess amount shall be ignored for the purpose of computing the aggregate amount of TP1 and PC1
Rule 16(2)(b), Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.