VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 112
Rules 2026

Rule 112 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 112 — Amendments to application.

Where this rule sits

← Rule 111  ·  Rule 113 →

What this rule does

Sub-rule (1) gives the applicant a right to ask: an applicant may request in writing for an amendment to an application at any stage, before the finalisation of the terms of the agreement.

Sub-rule (2) leaves the decision with the authority and fixes the limit on it. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation), for a unilateral agreement, or the competent authority of India, for a bilateral or multilateral agreement, may allow the amendment if it does not have the effect of altering the nature of the application as originally filed.

Why it is there

An advance pricing agreement is negotiated over a long period, and the facts an applicant put forward at the start may need correction as the process runs. Without a stated route, a change would mean withdrawing and starting again. Rule 112 provides the route, but bounds it: the discretion to allow an amendment stops where the amendment would change the nature of the application as originally filed, so an applicant cannot use it to obtain a different agreement from the one applied for.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

Two limits do the work. The first is timing: the request must come before the finalisation of the terms of the agreement, so once terms are settled the route is closed. The second is subject matter: the amendment must not alter the nature of the application as originally filed, which is a narrower test than materiality — a correction of facts or figures sits inside it, a change to what is being applied for does not. The rule says the authority "may" allow the amendment, so even a request within both limits is not granted as of right, and which authority decides depends on whether the application is unilateral or bilateral or multilateral.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company with a pending unilateral advance pricing agreement application finds that the transactions covered were described with an error in the transfer pricing method attributed to one of them. It requests an amendment in writing before the terms are finalised. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation) may allow it if the correction does not alter the nature of the application as originally filed. A request instead to bring in a wholly different class of transaction would not clear that test.

Where you meet this rule

You meet it during the advance pricing agreement process, as the written amendment request an applicant files with the authority handling its application and the response allowing or refusing it.

The words themselves

An applicant may request in writing for an amendment to an application at any stage, before the finalisation of the terms of the agreement.
Rule 112(1), Income-tax Rules, 2026.
if such an amendment does not have effect of altering the nature of the application as originally filed
Rule 112(2), Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.