VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawRates by year › AY 2004-05
Finance Act, 2004Re-read 2 September 2026Previous year 2003-04

Income-tax rates for assessment year 2004-05

The rates Finance Act, 2004 charged on the income of the previous year 2003-04, taken from the Act’s own charging section and First Schedule.

Independently re-read on 2 September 2026
A second pass went back to the department’s text at the sources listed at the foot of this page and read these figures again. That check is recorded in the record itself as verified_on: 2026-09-02.
What this year’s reading did not reach
NO CESS IS RECORDED FOR THIS ASSESSMENT YEAR, AND THAT IS DELIBERATE. Part I of the First Schedule mentions no Education Cess. The Education Cess of two per cent does appear in this Act, at section 2(11), but its opening words limit it to 'The amount of income-tax as specified in sub-sections (4) to (10)' - that is, to deduction of tax at source and to advance tax for the financial year 2004-2005 (assessment year 2005-06). It is therefore NOT a cess on the income-tax charged by section 2(1) for the assessment year commencing 1 April 2004, and has not been filed as one. Section 2 states no 'maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax'; the Rs. 50,000 exemption is taken from the Nil row of Paragraph A. Paragraph A has no separate table for women or for senior citizens in this year. The record does not display the Act's formal short title, so it could not be confirmed from the document whether this is the Finance Act, 2004 or the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004; section 2(1) unambiguously charges the assessment year commencing 1 April 2004. No marginal-relief proviso for the individual surcharge was returned by the fetch.

Which Act set these rates

Act
Finance Act, 2004
Assessment year
2004-05
Income of the previous year
2003-04
What was read
the charging section and the First Schedule
The Act itself
Finance Act, 2004 in this library

Finance Act, 2004 charged income-tax for the assessment year commencing 1 April 2004. What it charged was the income of the previous year 2003-04. The two are a year apart and the difference matters: a table headed by the wrong one is useless.

The slabs

Single

individual, Hindu undivided family, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person (Part I, Paragraph A)

Maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax: Rs 50,000

Total incomeRate of income-tax
Up to Rs 50,000Nil
Rs 50,001 – Rs 60,00010%
Rs 60,001 – Rs 1,50,00020%
Rs 1,50,001 and above30%

Paragraph A as printed: does not exceed Rs. 50,000 - Nil; exceeds Rs. 50,000 but does not exceed Rs. 60,000 - 10 per cent of the amount by which the total income exceeds Rs. 50,000; exceeds Rs. 60,000 but does not exceed Rs. 1,50,000 - Rs. 1,000 plus 20 per cent of the amount by which the total income exceeds Rs. 60,000; exceeds Rs. 1,50,000 - Rs. 19,000 plus 30 per cent of the amount by which the total income exceeds Rs. 1,50,000.

Senior citizens, very senior citizens, and women

Only where the Act for this year set a separate threshold or a separate table. Where it did not, this page says so.

Resident senior citizens

This year’s record carries no separate table or threshold under this head.

Resident very senior citizens

This year’s record carries no separate table or threshold under this head.

Resident women

This year’s record carries no separate table or threshold under this head.

Surcharge

Total incomeSurcharge on the income-tax
Rs 8,50,001 and above10%

Part I, Paragraph A: 'in the case of every individual or Hindu undivided family or association of persons or body of individuals having a total income exceeding eight hundred and fifty thousand rupees, be reduced by the amount of rebate of income-tax calculated under Chapter VIII-A, and the income-tax as so reduced, be increased by a surcharge for purposes of the Union calculated at the rate of ten per cent of such income-tax.' Paragraphs B, C, D and E each carry a surcharge of 2.5 per cent of such income-tax.

Cess

No cess is recorded for this year.

Marginal relief

No marginal-relief provision is recorded for this year.

Companies, firms, co-operative societies and local authorities

Reproduced in the Act’s own words, because these rates carry conditions a single percentage cannot.
AssesseeRate as the Act states it
Domestic company35 per cent of the total income; surcharge 2.5 per cent of such income-tax
Foreign company50 per cent on royalties and fees for technical services under the specified approved agreements; 40 per cent on the balance of the total income; surcharge 2.5 per cent of such income-tax
Firms and limited liability partnerships35 per cent on the whole of the total income; surcharge 2.5 per cent of such income-tax (Part I, Paragraph C)
Co-operative societiesPart I, Paragraph B: total income not exceeding Rs. 10,000 - 10 per cent of the total income; exceeding Rs. 10,000 but not exceeding Rs. 20,000 - Rs. 1,000 plus 20 per cent of the amount by which the total income exceeds Rs. 10,000; exceeding Rs. 20,000 - Rs. 3,000 plus 30 per cent of the amount by which the total income exceeds Rs. 20,000; surcharge 2.5 per cent of such income-tax
Local authorities30 per cent on the whole of the total income; surcharge 2.5 per cent of such income-tax (Part I, Paragraph D)

What changed from the year before

Worked out by comparing this record with the one for the preceding assessment year in this collection. Where a figure is absent from either record, that is said rather than guessed.

Sources

The Income Tax Department’s own records for this Act. These are the documents the figures above were read out of.

The department’s index of Finance Acts is at https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/finance-acts.

The years either side

← AY 2003-04 · AY 2005-06 →

What this page is, and what it is not

The figures are the Finance Act’s own. Every rate, threshold and exemption on this page was taken out of the Income Tax Department’s own text of the Act that charged the year — the charging section and the First Schedule — and the records we read are linked under Sources on each year’s page. The writing around the figures is ours: the arrangement, the headings, the comparison with the year before and every sentence of explanation. Those are not the Act.
These tables are for orientation. The Act governs. A rate table is a finding aid, not the law. The Act, its First Schedule and the provisos in it decide what is payable, and a table cannot carry the provisos. If you are about to rely on a figure here — in a return, in a computation, in a reply to a notice — open the source linked on the year’s page and read the figure in the Act for yourself. Where a record did not reach a rate, this library says so rather than filling the gap.