VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawNotifications1999 › S.O. 97(E)
Notification 11 February 1999

S.O. 97(E)

Companies specified in column (2) of the Table below and specifies the eligible projects or schemes and the estimated cost thereof approved under section 35AC

What this is

S.O. 97(E) was published on 11 February 1999. Its subject is Companies specified in column (2) of the Table below and specifies the eligible projects or schemes and the estimated cost thereof approved under section 35AC.

This is an approval of a named institution. It affects that institution and the people who deal with it; the years it covers are stated in it and are the whole of its reach.

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.35ACno counterpart recorded

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government on the recommendations of the National Committee, hereby approves the companies specified in column (2) of the Table below and specifies the eligible projects or schemes and the estimated cost thereof as mentioned in column (3) of the said Table and also specifies in the column (4) of the said Table, the maximum amount of such cost which may be allowed as a deduction under the said section 35AC.

TABLE ------- Serial Name of the company Project or scheme and Maximum No. estimated cost thereof amount of cost to be allowed as deduction under section 35AC ------- (1) (2) (3) (4) ------- 1. Bajaj Hindustan Limited, Rural development pro- Rs. 13.65 lakhs. Bajaj Bhawan, 2nd Floor, jects, viz., immunisation Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, camp, cholera vaccina- Nariman Point, Mumbai- tion camp, installation of 400021. bio-gas plant and India Mark Pump Set, carpet weaving centre, repair and maintenance of Wind Mills and Pump Set, Tree Plantation, Rural Exten- sion Services, Distribu- tion of Solar Lantern, etc., at Golgokarannath and Palia Kalan, District Kheri of Uttar Pradesh ; likely to cost Rs. 25.46 lakhs. 2. Tata Sponge Iron Digging of tube-wells for Rs.10 lakhs. Limited, P.O. Joda, Distt. providing potable drink- Keonjhar, Orissa. ing water, repairing of schools, promotion/im- provement of agricultural activities and providing medical facilities in vari- ous villages in Keonjhar District of Orissa ; likely to cost Rs. 10 lakhs ----

2. This notification shall remain in force for a period of three years in relation to the assessment years 1999-2000, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002.

[No. 10787/F. No. NC-132/98]

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← S.O. 98(E)  ·  S.O. 96(E) →

What a notification is. A notification is made under a power the Act itself gives, and within that power it is law — unlike a circular, which only binds the department. Its reach is the reach of the enabling provision and no wider, and the date it carries decides from when it works.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.