VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars2018 › Circular No. 4/2018
CBDT circular 14 August 2018

Circular No. 4/2018

Computation of admissible deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

What this is

Circular No. 4/2018 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 14 August 2018. Its subject is Computation of admissible deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What it does

Takes the department off a long running fight about the section 10A formula. Under sub-section (4) of section 10A, export profits are the profits of the undertaking's business in the proportion that export turnover bears to total turnover, and clause (iv) of Explanation 2 defines export turnover to leave out freight, telecommunication charges and insurance attributable to delivery outside India and expenses incurred in foreign exchange in providing technical services outside India. Whether those same items must also come out of total turnover had been highly contentious. The Board records that the controversy was finally settled by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III v. HCL Technologies Ltd, decided on 24 April 2018, and sets out the holding: what is excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover, since export turnover is itself a component of total turnover, and the same principle applies to expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing technical services outside India, because any other reading makes the formula unworkable and absurd.

Why it was issued

Both questions - freight, telecommunication and insurance, and charges for technical services rendered abroad - had been highly contentious, and the Supreme Court had now settled them.

Who it reaches

The instrument, as the Board published it

The department publishes this one only as a PDF, so the words below were read out of that PDF by machine. That reading can carry its own mistakes — a misread number, a broken line. Check the signed document before you rely on a figure in it.

F. No. 279/Misc.l140/201SIITJ Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No. 412018 New Delhi, 141hAugust 2018 Computation of admissible deduction uls lOA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Regarding As per the provisions of sub-section (4) of section lOA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the' Act'), the profits derived from export of articles or things or computer software shall be the amount which bears to the profits of the business of the undertaking, the same proportion as the export turnover in respect of such articles or things or computer software bears to the total turnover of the business carried on by the undertaking. 2. Further as per clause (iv) to Explanation 2 to section lOA of the Act, "export turnover'" means the consideration in respect of export by the undertaking of articles or things or computer software received in, or brought into, India by the assessee in convertible foreign exchange in accordance with sub-section (3), but does not include freight, telecommunication charges or insurance attributable to the delivery of the articles or things or computer software outside India or expenses, if any, incurred in foreign exchange in providing the technical services outside India. 3 The issue whether freight. telecommunication charges and insurance expenses are to be excluded from both "'export turnover"" and ""total turnover'" while working out deduction admissible under section lOA of the Act on the ground that they are attributable to delivery of articles or things or computer software outside India has been highly contentious. Similarly, the issue whether charges for providing technical services outside India are to be excluded both from ""export turnover"' and '"total turnover'" while computing deduction admissible under section lOA of the Act on the ground that such charges are relatable towards expenses incurred in convertible foreign exchange In providing technical services outside India has also been highly contentious. 4. The controversy has been finally settled by the Hon' ble Supreme Court vide its judgement dated 24.4.2018 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III Vs. MIs HCL Technologies Ltd. l While deciding the issue the Apex Court has held as under: "17) The similar nature of controversy. akin to this case, arose before the Kamataka High COllrt in C1Tvs. Tata Elxsi Ltd (2012) 20-1 TcLY/nan 32111 7. The isslle before the Kamataka High Court was whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that while computing reli~r under Seclion10A Of the IT Act, the amount of 1 CA No. 8489-8490 of2013, NJRS Citation 2018-LL-0424-40 communicalion expenses should be excluded from Ihe lolallurnover if Ihe same are reduced from Ihe export turnover:' While giving Ihe answer 10 the issue, Ihe High Co urI, inler-alia, held Ihal when a parlicular word is nol defined by Ihe legislalllre and an ordinary meaning is 10 be allribuled 10 iI, Ihe said ordinalY meaning is 10 be in conformity wilh Ihe context in which il is used. Hence, what is excludedfrom 'exporllurnover ' musl also be excludedji'om 'Iolallurnover', since one of Ihe components of 'Iotal turnover' is export turnover. Any other inlerpretalion would run counter to Ihe legislalive intent and would be impermissible. 18) AccGrdingly. theformulafor computation oflhe deduction under SectionlOA of the Act would be as follows: £'port Profil total Profit of the Business Export turnover as defined in Explanalion 2 (JV) of Seclion lOA of IT Act Export lurnover as defined in Explanation 2(JV) of Section lOA of the IT Act + domestic sale proceeds 19) In the inslant case. if Ihe deductions on freight. telecommunication and insurance allribulable 10 the delivery of computer sojhvare under SeclionlOA of the IT Ar.t are allowed only in £'port Turnover but not from the Total Turnover then, it would give rise to inadverlent. IInla\l1l1l, meaningless and illogical result which wOllld calise grave injustice to the Respondent which cOllld have never been the intention of the legislature. 20) Even in common parlance, when the object of the formula is to arrive atlhe profit from export business. expenses excluded from export lurnover have to be excluded froll1 lotalturnover also. Othenvise. any other interpretation makes the formula unworkable and absurd. Hence, we are satisfied that sllch dedllction shall be allowedfrom the totallllrnover in same proportion as well. 21) On Ihe issue of expenses on technical services provided outside. we have to follow the same principle of interpretation as followed in the case of expenses of freight, telecommunication etc. , othenvise the formula of calculation would be fillile. Hence. in the same way. expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing the technical services outside shall be allowed to exclude/rom the total turnover. " 5. The issue has been examined by the Board and it is clarified that freight, telecommunication charges and insurance expenses are to be excluded both from "export turnover" and ·'total turnover" , while working out deduction admissible under section lOA of the Act to the extent they are attributable to the delivery of articles or things or computer software outside India. , 6. Similarly, expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing the technical services outside India are to be excluded from both "export turnover" and "total turnover" while computing deduction admissible under section lOA of the Act. Thus, all charges/expenses specified in Explanation 2(iv) to section lOA of the Act, are liable to be excluded from total turnover also for the purpose of computation of deduction u/s lOA of the Act. 7. Accordingly, henceforth, appeals may not be filed by the Department on the above settled issue, and those already filed may be withdrawn/ not pressed upon. 8. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 9. Hindi version of the same will follow. Copy to: f\!?~f.\~lt (Neetika Bansal) Director (IT J) CBDT, New Delhi I. The Chairperson. Members and officers of the CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above. 2. OSD to Revenue Secretary. 3. All Pro Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax & All Directors General of Income-Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers. 4. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 5. The Pr. Director General of Income-Tax, NADT, Nagpur. 6. The Pr. DGIT (Systems), ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi. 7. The Pr. DOlT (Vigilance), New Delhi. 8. The ADG (PR. PP & OL) for circulation as per usual mailing list. 9. The ADG-4 (Systems) for uploading on Income Tax Department website. 10. Database Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.gov.in 11.njrs_support@nsdl.co.in for uploading on NJRS. 12. Hindi section for Hindi translation of the Circular. 13. Guard File ~()Jv..,~~ ~O!lJYO(8 Director (lTJ) CBDT, New Delhi

What to watch

Where you meet it

On a section 10A computation in assessment or appeal where the Assessing Officer has reduced export turnover by these items but left total turnover untouched.

← Circular No. 5/2018  ·  Circular No. 3/2018 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.