VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars2017 › Circular No. 16/2017
CBDT circular 25 April 2017

Circular No. 16/2017

Lease rent from letting out buildings/developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park /SEZ - to be treated as business income

What this is

Circular No. 16/2017 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 25 April 2017. Its subject is Lease rent from letting out buildings/developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park /SEZ - to be treated as business income.

The instrument itself

The text, read by machine from the scan

This is not the department’s typed text. The department published this one as a scanned image of a signed paper, so there is no text in the file to copy. What follows was read off that image by optical character recognition and is reproduced without correction — the mistakes you can see are the machine’s, and there may be others you cannot. It is here so the document can be found and read; it is not a substitute for the file, which is linked below. Do not quote from this page.

Circular No. 16/2017
F.No. 279/Mise./140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
New Delhi, 25" April, 2017
SUBJECT: Lease rent from letting out buildings/developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ- to be treated as business income.
The issue whether income arising from letting out of premises /developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ is to be charged under head 'Profits and Gains of Business’ or under the head ‘Income from House Property’ has been subject matter of litigation in recent years. Assessees claim the letting out as business activity, the income arising from which to be charged to tax under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business’, whereas the Assessing Officers hold it to be chargeable under the head ‘Income from House
Property’.
2. The matter has been considered by the Board. Income from the Industrial Parks/ SEZ
established under various schemes framed and notified under section SOIA(4)(iii) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is liable to be treated as income from business provided the conditions prescribed under the schemes are met.
In the case of Velankani Information Systems Pyt Ltd’, the Hon’ble Karnataka High
Court observed that any other interpretation would defeat the object of section 801A of the
Act and government schemes for development of Industrial Parks in the country. SLPs filed in this case by the Department have been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
In a subsequent judgment dated 30.04.2014 in ITA No 76 & 78/2012 in the case of
CIT vs. Information Technology Park Ltd.’, the Karnataka High Court has reaffirmed its:
earlier views. It has held that, since the assessee-company was engaged in the business of developing, operating and maintaining an Industrial Park and providing infrastructure facilities to different companies as its business, the lease rent received by the assessee from letting out buildings along with other amenities in a software technology park would be chargeable to tax under the head “Income from Business” and not under the head “Income from House Property”. The judgement has been accepted by the Board.
3. In view of the above, it is now a settled position that in the case of an undertaking which develops, develops and operates or maintains and operates an industrial park/SEZ
notified in accordance with the scheme framed and notified by the Government, the income from letting out of premises/ developed space along with other facilities in an industrial park/SEZ is to be charged to tax under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business’.
* NJRS Citation [2013-LL-0402-44]
* NURS Citation [2014-LL-0430-141]
Daan 1 nf?

4. Accordingly, henceforth, appeals may not be filed by the Department on the above settled issue and those already filed may be withdrawn/ not pressed upon.
5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
Ad.
(D.S. Chaudhry),
CIT (A&J), CBDT,
New Delhi.
Copy to:
1. The Chairman, Members and officers of the CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above.
2. OSD to Revenue Secretary.
3. All Pr. Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax & All Directors General of Income-Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers.
4. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
5. The Pr. Director General of Income-Tax, NADT, Nagpur.
6. The Pr. DGIT (Systems), ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.
7. The Pr. DGIT (Vigilance), New Delhi.
8. The ADG (PR, PP & OL) for circulation as per usual mailing list.
9. The ADG-4 (Systems) for uploading on ITD website.
10. Data Base Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.
11. Guard file.
ALF, iy (D.S. Chaudhry),
CIT (A&J), CBDT,
New Delhi.
Pace 7 of 2

Source: the department’s scanned file.

← Circular No. 17/2017  ·  Circular 14/2017 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.