Circular No. 38/2016

The text, read by machine from the scan

This is not the department’s typed text. The department published this one as a scanned image of a signed paper, so there is no text in the file to copy. What follows was read off that image by optical character recognition and is reproduced without correction — the mistakes you can see are the machine’s, and there may be others you cannot. It is here so the document can be found and read; it is not a substitute for the file, which is linked below. Do not quote from this page.

; CIRCULAR NO. 38/2016
F.No.279/ Misc. /140/2015-ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Ree
New Delhi, Dated 2204 November, 2016
Subject: Admissibility of expenditure incurred by a Firm on Keyman Insurance
Policy in the case of a Partner- Reg.
The issue relating to admissibility of expenditure incurred by a firm on Keyman
Insurance Policy premium in the case of a partner has been a contentious one.
2. CBDT Circular no. 762/1998 dated 18.02.1998 clarifies that the premium paid on the Keyman Insurance Policy is allowable as business expenditure. However, in case of such expenditure incurred on a partner of a firm, the general approach of the assessing officers was to treat the expenditure as not incurred for the purpose of business and disallow the same.
3. High Courts have upheld the admissibility of the expenditure incurred by the firm in the case of the partners!. Taking into account the Explanation to Clause (10D} of
Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the CBDT Circular no. 762 dated 18.02.1998,
Courts have held that a Keyman Insurance Policy is not confined to a policy taken for an employee but also extends to an insurance policy taken with respect to the life of another person who is connected in any manner whatsoever with the business of the subscniber (assessee),
4, The High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case of M/s. Ramesh Steels, [TA No.
437 of 2015, vide judgement dated 2.2.2016 (NURS citation 2016 -LL-0505-68), reiterating the above view held that, “the said policy when obtained to secure the life of a partner to .
safeguard the firm against a disruption of the business is equally for the benefit of the partnership business which may be effected as a resuit of premature death of a partner.
Thus, the premium on the Keyman Insurance Policy of partner of the firm is wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and ts allowable as business expenditure”.
2. The above view has been accepted by CBDT and the judgment has net been further contested.
! High Court of Bombay —-CIT vs. B.N, Exports, ITA No. 2714 of 2009 dated 31.03,2010-
NJRS citation 2010-LL-0331-10, CIT vs. Aggarwal Enterprises, ITA Na. 1701 of 2012 dated
07.01.2015 -NJRS citation 2015-LL-0107-4.
High Court of Gujarat- CIT vs. Gem Arts, ITA No. 1739 of 2009 dated 13.03.2012-NJRS
citation 2012-LL-0313
High Court of Punjab & Haryana- CIT vs. Laj Exports, ITA No. 251 of 2012 dated
08.11.2013-NJRS citation 2013-LL-1108-72
Page 1

6. In view of this, it is a settled position that in case of a firm, premium paid by the firm on the Keyman Insurance Policy of a partner, to safeguard the firm against a disruption of the business, is an admissible expenditure under section 37 of the Act.
7, Accordingly, henceforth, on this settled issue, appeals may not be filed by the department and those already filed, may be withdrawn/ not pressed upon.
&, The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
ae
—<—# — RY hi, /) 6
{K. Vamsi Krishna) i
ACIT (OSD) (ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi
Copy to:
1. The Chairman, Members and officers of the CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above.
2. OSD to Revenue Secretary.
3. All Pr. Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax & All Directors General of Income-Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers.
4, The Pr. Director General of Income-Tax, NADT, Nagpur.
9S. The Pr. DGIT (Systems), ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.
6. The Pr. DGIT (Vigilance), New Delhi.
7, The ADG (PR, PP & OL), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi fer printing in the quarterly tax bulletin and for circulation as per usual mailing list.
8. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
9, The ADG-4 (Systems) for uploading on ITD website.
10. Data Base Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.
11. Guard file. :
a ee
FF 2 >} tf if t (K. Vamsi Krishna)
ACIT (OSD)(ITY),
CBDT, New Delhi.
Page 2