VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1989 › Circular No. 544
CBDT circular 15 September 1989

Circular No. 544

327. Rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 - Whether subsidy received by producers of regional feature films, which has not been charged to tax, shall not be reduced from cost of production of the film

What this is

Circular No. 544 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 15 September 1989. Its subject is 327. Rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 - Whether subsidy received by producers of regional feature films, which has not been charged to tax, shall not be reduced from cost of production of the film.

What it does

Settles the treatment of State Government subsidy to producers of regional language feature films. The Board decides that such subsidy should not be charged to tax as a revenue receipt. But it points to the Explanation to rule 9A(1), as amended by the Income-tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 1989 with effect from 7-7-1989, under which the cost of production of a feature film is to be reduced by a Government scheme subsidy that has not been included in total income. So the untaxed subsidy comes off the cost of production instead. Both the amendment and this concession apply from assessment year 1990-91 onwards.

Why it was issued

Representations were received against taxing the subsidy, income-tax authorities had been treating it as a revenue receipt incidental to the film business, Tribunal Benches were divided, and the Board wished to avoid controversy and litigation. The circular notes that the Andhra Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Chitra Kalpa held the subsidy to be a capital receipt.

Who it reaches

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

327. Rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 - Whether subsidy received by producers of regional feature films, which has not been charged to tax, shall not be reduced from cost of production of the film
1. The Board has received representations against the taxation of the subsidy granted by the State Governments to producers of feature films in regional languages.
2. The income-tax authorities have been treating the subsidy as revenue receipt incidental to the carrying on of the business of film production and have been charging it to tax. Different Benches of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal are divided on this issue. The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in the case of CIT v. Chitra Kalpa [1989] 177 ITR 540 held that the subsidy has the character of a capital receipt.
3. With a view to avoiding controversy and litigation in the matter, the Board has decided that such subsidy received by producers of regional feature films should not be charged to tax as revenue receipt.
4. In this connection, it may, however, be pointed out that the Explanation to sub-rule (1) of rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, as amended by the Income-tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 1989 with effect from 7th July, 1989, provides, inter alia, that the cost of production of a feature film shall be reduced by the subsidy received by the film producer under any scheme framed by Government, where such amount of subsidy has not been included in computing the total income of the assessee for any assessment year. Conversely the amount received by producers of regional feature films, which has not been charged to tax, shall be reduced from the cost of production of the film for the purpose of rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
5. The aforesaid amendment which has come into force with effect from 7th July, 1989 will apply in relation to the assessment year 1990-91 and subse- quent assessment years. Similarly, the concession provided under paragraph 3 of this Circular, which is intimately linked with the amendment of the aforesaid rule 9A, will also apply in relation to the assessment year 1990-91 and subsequent years.
Source : Circular No. 541, dated 25-7-1989, as amended by, Circular No. 544, dated 15-9-1989.

What to watch

Where you meet it

On a film producer's assessment where the Assessing Officer either taxes the subsidy or disallows part of the cost of production under rule 9A.

What it names

Rules it names. Rule 9A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The 1962 Rules were replaced by the Income-tax Rules, 2026, which renumbered nearly everything: a rule number quoted here almost never means the same rule today.

← Circular No. 545  ·  Circular No. 543 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.