VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1985 › Circular No. 423
CBDT circular 26 June 1985

Circular No. 423

Clarifications on issues relating to effect of filing higher estimates of income for advance tax purposes on assess­ments for earlier years/filing of returns of income by new assessees declaring substantial income in the initial assessment year/filing of higher returns of wealth for earlier years

What this is

Circular No. 423 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 26 June 1985. Its subject is Clarifications on issues relating to effect of filing higher estimates of income for advance tax purposes on assess­ments for earlier years/filing of returns of income by new assessees declaring substantial income in the initial assessment year/filing of higher returns of wealth for earlier years.

This is a clarification. The Board is stating how it reads a provision. That reading binds the department; it does not bind a court, and where the section says otherwise the section wins.

What it does

Reassures taxpayers who declared a much higher income for advance tax in the financial year 1985-86 than had been assessed or returned for earlier years. The Board says that such a declaration is not by itself a valid ground for reopening an earlier assessment under section 147(1)(a) or (b), nor for starting roving enquiries in a pending assessment for an earlier year; Income-tax Officers must go by the principles laid down by the High Courts and the Supreme Court on when reopening is permissible. It also rejects the opposite claim: a taxpayer found to have concealed income of an earlier year cannot say it should escape assessment in that year because he brought it into his 1985-86 advance tax estimate, since income of a year can be assessed only in that year. The suggested course for such a taxpayer is a voluntary and good faith full and true disclosure before detection, followed by an application to the Commissioner under section 273A for reduction or waiver of penalty and interest.

Why it was issued

The Finance Act, 1985 rationalised personal income-tax rates to secure better compliance, and fears were expressed that a higher advance tax estimate would invite reopening of past years or roving enquiries.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.147s.279
s.273As.469

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

Clarifications on issues relating to effect of filing higher estimates of income for advance tax purposes on assess­ments for earlier years/filing of returns of income by new assessees declaring substantial income in the initial assessment year/filing of higher returns of wealth for earlier years

Effect of higher estimates of income for advance tax purposes in financial year 1985-86 on assessments in relation to earlier years - 1. The Finance Act, 1985 has, with the objective of securing better tax compliance, rationalised the rates of person­al income-tax. Fears have, however, been expressed that where a taxpayer declares, for purposes of payment of advance tax during the current financial year, a substantially higher income than that assessed for any earlier year, the Income-tax Officer may suspect that income chargeable to tax for that year has been underas­sessed and, accordingly, reopen the assessment for that year. Fears have also been expressed that where the income declared for purposes of payment of advance tax during the current financial year is higher than the income declared in the return of income for an earlier year, the Income-tax Officer may start roving enquiries against the taxpayer in the pending assessment proceed­ings for that year.
2. The circumstances in which an assessment can be reopened under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 147 have been clearly enunciated in a number or decisions of various High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Income-tax Officers have, therefore, to follow these principles in reopening the assess­ments for past years. In terms of the principles enunciated in those decisions, the mere declaration, for purposes of payment of advance tax, of a much higher income than that assessed for any earlier year, will not constitute a valid ground for reopening the assessment for any earlier year, or for starting roving inquiries against the taxpayer in any pending assessment proceed­ing.
3. Clarification has also been sought on the question whether a taxpayer, who is found to have concealed his income for any earlier year, can claim that such income should not be assessed in that year on the ground that he had included such income in the estimate of advance tax furnished by him for the financial year 1985-86. Such a claim is clearly untenable. Income which relates to a particular assessment year can be assessed only in that year. Hence a taxpayer will not be able to claim that any part of the higher income declared by him for purposes of payment of advance tax should be set off against the income found to have been concealed by him for any earlier year. In such cases, the advisable course for the taxpayer will be to, voluntarily and in good faith, make a full and true disclosure of his concealed income, prior to its detection by the ITO, and then make an application to the Commissioner for the reduction or waiver of penalty and interest under section 273A.
Circular : No. 423 [F. No. 225/86/85-IT(A-II)], dated 26-6-1985.

What to watch

Where you meet it

On a section 148 notice for an earlier year said to be prompted by a jump in the current year's declared income, or in a section 273A petition after a voluntary disclosure.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 424  ·  Circular No. 422 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.