VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1984 › Circular No. 382
CBDT circular 4 May 1984

Circular No. 382

45. Taxation of shares of Indian companies allotted to non-residents in consideration for the purchase of machinery and plant delivered abroad under clause (vi)/(vii) of sub-section (1)

What this is

Circular No. 382 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 4 May 1984. Its subject is 45. Taxation of shares of Indian companies allotted to non-residents in consideration for the purchase of machinery and plant delivered abroad under clause (vi)/(vii) of sub-section (1).

What it does

Withdraws paragraph 11 of Public Circular No. 21 of 1969. That paragraph had told officers not to tax the profit on shares issued by an Indian company at incorporation in consideration for the transfer abroad of technical know-how or services or the delivery abroad of machinery and plant, merely because the situs of the shares is in India, where the payment was not taxable under section 5(2)(b). After clauses (vi) and (vii) were inserted in section 9(1) by Finance Act, 1976 with effect from 1 June 1976, royalties and fees for technical services under collaboration agreements entered into on or after 1 April 1976 are chargeable under section 5(2)(b), so paragraph 11 could cover only allotments for delivery abroad of machinery and plant. The Board takes the view that even there the income embedded in the payment is received in India, the shares being located in India, and is therefore chargeable. Holding the concession to be extra-legal, it withdraws paragraph 11 with immediate effect.

Why it was issued

Questions were raised on whether the clarifications in Public Circular No. 21 of 1969 still held good after the Finance Act, 1976 amendments to section 9(1).

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.5s.5
s.9s.9

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

45. Taxation of shares of Indian companies allotted to non-residents in consideration for the purchase of machinery and plant delivered abroad under clause (vi)/(vii) of sub-section (1)
1. Clauses (vi ) and (vii) have been inserted in sub-section (1) of section 9 by the Finance Act, 1976, with effect from 1-6-1976. As a result, income by way of royalties and fees for technical services is deemed to accrue or arise in India in the cases specified under these provisions.
There are, however, two exceptions to the above general position. Firstly, lump sum consideration paid under approved agreements made before 1-4-1976 for the transfer outside India of, or the imparting of information outside India in respect of, any date, documentation, drawing or specification relating to any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark, or other similar property is not deemed to accrue or arise in India, and secondly, income by way of fees for technical services under approved agreements made before that date is not deemed to accrue or arise in India.
2. In this context, certain questions have been raised as to whether the clarifications contained in Public Circular No. 21 of 1969 would be applicable. In para 11 of this circular, it was stated that in a case where, shares are issued at the time of incorporation of an Indian company in consideration for the transfer abroad of technical know-how or services, or delivery abroad of machinery and plant, and the payment is not taxable under section 5(2)(b ) as income accruing or arising or deemed to accrue or arise in India, no attempt should be made by the department to bring to tax the profits or gains on such transactions merely on the ground that the situs of the shares is in India.
3. As a result of the amendments brought about by the Finance Act, 1976, royalties or fees for technical services paid in pursuance of collaboration agreements entered into on or after April 1, 1976, are chargeable to tax under section 5(2)(b). The contents of para 11 of Circular No. 21 of 1969 would cover only cases where shares in Indian companies are allotted to a non-resident for delivery abroad of machinery and plant. Where shares in Indian companies are allotted in consideration for the machinery and plant, the income embedded in the payments would be received in India as the shares in the Indian companies are located in India and would accordingly attract liability to income-tax as income received in India.
4. In view of the legal position, the concessions in paragraph 11 of the said circular are in the nature of extra legal concessions and the Board have decided to withdraw the same. Paragraph 11 of the Public Circular No. 21, may, therefore, be treated as withdrawn with immediate effect.
Circular : No. 382 [F. No. 484/12/78-FTD], dated 4-5-1984.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In a non-resident's assessment or a section 195 question where shares in an Indian company are the consideration for plant or know-how supplied from abroad.

What it names

It mentions. Circular No. 21/1969

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 383  ·  Circular No. 381 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.