VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1980 › Circular No. 283
CBDT circular 25 September 1980

Circular No. 283

1689. Exemption limit of taxable income raised from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 12,000 by Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 – Persons paying salary permitted to make adjustments of tax deducted at source against tax deductible from salaries

What this is

Circular No. 283 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 25 September 1980. Its subject is 1689. Exemption limit of taxable income raised from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 12,000 by Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 – Persons paying salary permitted to make adjustments of tax deducted at source against tax deductible from salaries.

This grants an exemption or a relief under a provision that allows one. Read the conditions attached: an exemption notification is construed strictly, and a condition missed is the exemption lost.

What it does

Lets employers self-adjust tax already deducted from employees who fell out of the charge when the exemption limit went up. The Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980 raised the exemption limit from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 12,000, and employees with estimated annual salary above Rs. 10,000 but not above Rs. 12,000 had already had tax deducted before the Act was passed. Instead of leaving them to claim refunds from the Income-tax Officer after 31 March 1981, the Board permits the employer, as a special case, to treat that tax as a surplus payment and set it off against tax deductible from other employees earning above Rs. 12,000 in later months of the same year. The employer must work out the surplus, reduce the monthly and progressive figures in columns 8 and 9 of the Form No. 21 return under rule 32, attach a list of the employees and amounts, revise the earlier Form No. 21 returns up to the month of adjustment, certify with that month's return that the employees have been reimbursed, and show in the section 203 certificate the excess deducted and refunded. An employer exempted from Form No. 21 by the Commissioner under rule 34 must still file monthly returns for these employees up to the month of adjustment.

Why it was issued

Leaving this group of employees to apply to the Income-tax Officer for refund after 31 March 1981 would have caused them hardship, and the Board acted to mitigate it.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.203s.395

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

1689. Exemption limit of taxable income raised from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 12,000 by Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 – Persons paying salary permitted to make adjustments of tax deducted at source against tax deductible from salaries
1. I am directed to invite your attention to the Board’s Circular No. 278 [F. No. 275/12/80-IT(B)], dated 26-8-1980 regarding deduction of income-tax from salaries during the financial year 1980-81.
2. You are aware that the exemption limit of taxable income has been raised from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 12,000 by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1980. In the case of employees whose estimated annual salary income exceeded Rs. 10,000 but did not exceed Rs. 12,000 income-tax was deducted at source before the enactment of the said Act and if they were to apply to the Income-tax Officer concerned for refund of such tax deducted at source after March 31, 1981, it would cause hardship to such persons.
3. With a view to mitigate such hardship, it has been decided that the persons responsible for paying the income in respect of salaries should be permitted, as a special case, to make adjustments of the tax deducted at source, on behalf of this group of employees, against the tax deductible from salaries of employees with estimated annual salary incomes exceeding Rs. 12,000 and payable to the credit of the Central Government during the subsequent months of the current financial year. Such adjust­ments will be made in the following manner.
4. The "persons responsible for paying" the salaries should, in the first instance, determine the amount of tax deducted and paid to the credit of the Central Government in the earlier months on account of the employees whose estimated annual salary income is likely to be below Rs. 12,000 (hereinafter referred to as "sur­plus payments"). After such determination, he should, for the months of adjustment, reduce the total of the tax deducted during the month and the progressive figures by the amount of "surplus payment" under columns 8 and 9 of the monthly return in Form No. 21 prescribed under rule 32 of the Income-tax Rules. A list showing names of the employees and the amount of "surplus pay­ment" against each should also be enclosed with the said monthly return. Simultaneously, action should be taken to revise the returns in Form No. 21 filed for the months earlier up to the month in which the adjustment of "surplus payment" is made and send them to the Income-tax Officer concerned so as to put mat­ters beyond doubt. Even where any person responsible for paying the salaries has been exempted by the Commissioner under rule 34 of the Income-tax Rules, from the requirement of furnishing monthly return in Form No. 21, he should submit, in respect of the employees whose income from salary is likely to be below Rs. 12,000, the monthly returns separately for each month only up to and along with the return in respect of such employees for the month in which the adjustment of tax deducted at source is made.
5. A certificate should also be furnished with the monthly return for the month in which adjustment of "surplus payment" is made, to the effect that the concerned employees have been reimbursed the amount of tax deducted earlier.
6. While giving certificates of tax deduction at source under section 203 of the Income-tax Act in individual cases, the person responsible for payment should take due care to indicate therein the amount of tax deducted in excess as a result of the raising of the exemption limit and subsequently refunded to the employees concerned.
7. These instructions would apply only to non-Government employees and that also for the financial year 1980-81.
Circular : No. 283 [F. No. 275/35/80/-IT(B)], dated 25-9-1980.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an old reconciliation of an employer's monthly deduction returns for 1980-81 against the tax actually paid over.

What it names

Forms it names. Form No. 21

Rules it names. Rule 32, 34 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The 1962 Rules were replaced by the Income-tax Rules, 2026, which renumbered nearly everything: a rule number quoted here almost never means the same rule today.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 284  ·  Circular No. 281 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.