VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1973 › Circular No. 105
CBDT circular 23 February 1973

Circular No. 105

927. Requirement of filing declaration under section 184(7), as amended by Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, within time allowed under section 139(1)/(2) for furnishing return of income - ITOs to be liberal in condoning delay for assessment year 1970-71 and earlier years where, even after 1-4-1971, declaration had been filed along with return

What this is

Circular No. 105 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 23 February 1973. Its subject is 927. Requirement of filing declaration under section 184(7), as amended by Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, within time allowed under section 139(1)/(2) for furnishing return of income - ITOs to be liberal in condoning delay for assessment year 1970-71 and earlier years where, even after 1-4-1971, declaration had been filed along with return.

What it does

Tells Income-tax Officers to be liberal in condoning delay in filing Form No. 12 for continuation of a firm's registration for assessment year 1970-71 and earlier years. Before the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, a registered firm kept the benefit of registration for a later year by furnishing the declaration in Form No. 12 along with the return; after the amendment, effective from 1st April 1971, the form must be furnished within the time allowed under section 139(1) or 139(2). Since the Board's own explanatory notes said the amendment applies to assessment year 1970-71 and earlier years too where registration or its continuance is considered on or after 1st April 1971, a firm that filed its return within section 139(4)(a) time and its Form No. 12 with it after April 1971 would lose registration on a strict reading. Proviso (ii) to section 184(7) lets the officer accept the declaration at any time before assessment if satisfied that sufficient cause prevented timely filing, and the Board directs that this power be used liberally in such cases.

Why it was issued

A strict reading of the amended section 184(7) was likely to cause genuine hardship to firms that had filed the declaration with the return after 1st April 1971 for earlier years.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.139s.2, s.263, s.349
s.184s.325

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

927. Requirement of filing declaration under section 184(7), as amended by Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, within time allowed under section 139(1)/(2) for furnishing return of income - ITOs to be liberal in condoning delay for assessment year 1970-71 and earlier years where, even after 1-4-1971, declaration had been filed along with return
1. Prior to the amendment of section 184(7) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, a firm, which had been granted registra­tion for any assessment year, could get the benefit of the regis­tration for a subsequent year provided, inter alia, that the firm furnished along with the return of income a declaration in Form No. 12. After the amendment of section 184(7), which is effective from April 1, 1971, the firm has to furnish Form No. 12 within the time allowed under section 139(1)/(2) for furnishing the return of income.
2. The Board, in the Explanatory Notes on provisions of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970, have observed that the amendment will apply not only in relation to the assessments for the year 1971-72 and subsequent years but also for the assessment year 1970-71 or any earlier year where the question of registration or continuation thereof is considered on or after April 1, 1971. If, therefore, an assessee-firm files returns of income for 1970-71 or earlier years within the time limit under section 139(4)(a) and also files Form No. 12 for continuation of registration after April 1, 1971, the firm would not be eligible for the benefits or registration because the form would not have been filed within the time allowed under section 139(1)/(2). A strict interpretation of this nature is likely to cause genuine hardship to such firms. Section 184(7), proviso (ii), however, empowers the Income-tax Officers to allow to furnish the declara­tion at any time before the assessment where he is satisfied that the firm was prevented by sufficient cause from furnishing the declaration in time. In view of the hardship that is likely to be caused, the Board desires that the Income-tax Officers should be liberal in condoning the delay for 1970-71 and the earlier as­sessment years, where, even after April, 1971, the declaration had been filed along with the return of income and condone the delay.
Circular : No. 105 [F. No. 225/86/71-IT(A-II)], dated 23-2-1973.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an order refusing continuation of a firm's registration for want of a timely Form No. 12, and in an appeal against assessment of the firm as unregistered.

What it names

Forms it names. Form No. 12

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 107  ·  Circular No. 104 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.