VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1971 › Circular No. 67
CBDT circular 23 September 1971

Circular No. 67

Section 10(26A) l Residents of Ladakh District

What this is

Circular No. 67 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 23 September 1971. Its subject is Section 10(26A) l Residents of Ladakh District.

This grants an exemption or a relief under a provision that allows one. Read the conditions attached: an exemption notification is construed strictly, and a condition missed is the exemption lost.

What it does

Explains the Ladakh exemption in section 10(26A) as it stood after the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971. Before that amendment, income accruing to a resident of Ladakh from a source in that district or outside India was exempt for assessment years 1962-63 to 1969-70, but only for persons other than Government servants who were resident in Ladakh in the previous year relevant to assessment year 1962-63 and were also resident there in the year of claim. The circular sets out the residence tests: 182 days or more in the district in the year; or a dwelling place maintained there for 182 days or more together with 30 days' presence; or 365 days or more in the four preceding years together with 60 days in the year. A Hindu undivided family, firm or association is presumed resident unless its control and management was situated wholly outside the district that year, and a company is resident if registered under a law in force in Jammu and Kashmir with its registered office there, or if its control and management was wholly there. The 1971 amendment extends the exemption by five years, to assessment years 1970-71 to 1974-75, and extends it to Government servants with retrospective effect from assessment year 1962-63, so a Government employee resident in Ladakh in the financial year 1961-62 and again in a later year may claim refund of tax paid on income of that later year from a source in the district or outside India, though not on income from a source in India outside Ladakh.

Why it was issued

References were received asking what exemption from income-tax was available to residents of Ladakh generally and to Government officers stationed there in particular, and the Board set out the position in law.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.10s.11, s.19

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

SECTION 10(26A) l RESIDENTS OF LADAKH DISTRICT
153. Exemption of income accruing to residents of Ladakh - Scope thereof explained
1. References have been received by the Central Board of Direct Taxes seeking information regarding the exemption from income-tax available to residents of Ladakh in general and Government officers stationed there in particular. The position in law as obtaining at present is explained in the following paragraphs.
2. The provisions in the Income-tax Act providing for exemption of certain incomes in the case of residents of Ladakh are incorporated in clause (26A) of section 10 as amended recently by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971. Under this clause, as it stood prior to its amendment, income accruing or arising to a resident of Ladakh from any source in that district or outside India was completely exempt from income-tax for all assessment years from 1962-63 to 1969-70 (inclusive). The exemption was available only in the case of persons other than Government servants, who, having been resident in Ladakh district in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1962-63, were also resident in that district during the relevant previous year for which the exemption is sought.
3. Under the relevant provision, an individual is considered to be a resident in Ladakh in any previous year if, he
a. was in that district in that year for a period or periods amounting in all to 182 days or more; or
b. maintained or caused to be maintained for him a dwelling place in that district for a period or periods amounting in all to 182 days or more in that year, and had been in that district for 30 days or more in that year; or
c. having within the four years preceding the relevant year been in that district for a period or periods amounting in all to 365 days or more, and was in that district for a period or periods amounting in all to 60 days or more in that year.
A Hindu undivided family, a firm or other association of persons would normally be presumed to be resident in that district in the relevant previous year except where, during that year, the control and management of its affairs was situated wholly outside that district. A company would be deemed to be resident in that district if it is a company registered under any law in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir and had its registered office in that district in the relevant previous year, or if the control and management of its affairs was, during the year, wholly situated in that district irrespective of its place of registration.
4. Under the amendment of clause (26A) of section 10 by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971, the period of exemption has been extended by another five years, namely, the assessment years 1970-71 to 1974-75. Further, the exemption has now been made available also to Government servants, with retrospective effect from the assessment year 1962-63, subject to the fulfilment of other conditions mentioned in the provision, as already explained. The effect of this change would be that Government employees who were resident in the district of Ladakh (in accordance with the criteria set forth in para 3 above) during the financial year 1961-62, which is the "previous year" relevant to the assessment year 1962-63, and were also similarly resident in that district in a later financial year, will now be entitled to claim refund of the tax paid by them in respect of their income of such later financial year which arose from a source in that district or outside India (but not in respect of their income arising from any source in India excluding Ladakh).
5. Any Government employee who comes within the scope of these provisions, may address his claim for refund to the Income-tax Officer by whom he is assessed. In a case, where no assessment has been made for the relevant year (due to the correct amount of tax having been deducted at source from the salary), the claim should ordinarily be made before (i) expiry of four years from the end of the assessment year, where it relates to the assessment year 1967-68 or any earlier year, or (ii) April 1, 1972, where it relates to the assessment year 1968-69 or 1969-70. Claims made in such cases up to March 31,1972 Will, accordingly, be in time for the assessment years 1967-68,1968-69 and 1969-70, i.e., in respect of the income of the financial years 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1968-69. In regard to earlier years, the statutory time limit for making the claim has already expired. In cases where an assessment has been made, the claim for rectification of such assessment may be made any time up to four years from the date of the assessment. Even on this basis, some claims may be out of time. However, having regard to the special circumstances in which the claim could not be made earlier, the Board will be prepared to consider relaxation of the time limit in such cases. The necessary requests in this behalf may be addressed to the Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, for this purpose.
Circular : No. 67 [F. No. 152(15) 71-TPL], dated 23-9-1971.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an old refund or rectification claim by a person resident in Ladakh, particularly a Government servant whose salary tax had been deducted at source.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 68  ·  Circular No. 66 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.