VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1969 › Circular No. 13
CBDT circular 14 April 1969

Circular No. 13

1007. Whether non-resident person (corporate as also non-corporate) owning 4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1968 and 43 /4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1972, are entitled to receive interest thereon without deduction of tax at source

What this is

Circular No. 13 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 14 April 1969. Its subject is 1007. Whether non-resident person (corporate as also non-corporate) owning 4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1968 and 43 /4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1972, are entitled to receive interest thereon without deduction of tax at source.

This grants an exemption or a relief under a provision that allows one. Read the conditions attached: an exemption notification is construed strictly, and a condition missed is the exemption lost.

What it does

Works out when interest on the 4¼ per cent National Defence Loan, 1968 and the 4¾ per cent National Defence Loan, 1972 may be paid without deduction under section 193. Non-residents, corporate and non-corporate, are exempt from income-tax on this interest by notification S.O. 3331, dated 19-10-1965 issued under section 10(4), and so are entitled to receive it without deduction. Residents are chargeable, but clause (ia) of the proviso to section 193 exempts from deduction interest payable to a resident individual, so tax is deducted where the resident payee is not an individual, such as a company. Where the loans stand in the name of a non-resident bank, no tax is deductible if the beneficial ownership is in the bank itself or in a non-resident constituent; the same holds where securities are deposited with a resident bank for a resident individual constituent, but not for a resident constituent who is not an individual. A foreign bank claiming payment without deduction must furnish the Public Debt Office a declaration as to beneficial ownership, stating, where the beneficial owner is a resident, whether he is an individual or not, and the Public Debt Offices of the Reserve Bank of India have been informed accordingly.

Why it was issued

A question arose whether paragraph 5 of the Ministry of Finance notification of 19-10-1965, exempting non-residents from tax on this interest, also exempted it from deduction at source, and whether a foreign bank could receive the interest gross even where it held the loans for a constituent.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.10s.11, s.19
s.193s.393

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

1007. Whether non-resident person (corporate as also non-corporate) owning 4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1968 and 43 /4 per cent National Defence Loan, 1972, are entitled to receive interest thereon without deduction of tax at source
1. A question has arisen whether the provisions of paragraph 5 of the Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) Notifi­cation No. 4(28) W&M/65, dated 19-10-1965, which lays down, inter alia, that non-residents will be exempt from tax under the Income-tax Act, on the interests on the above-mentioned loans held by them, has the effect to exempting the interest on these loans from deduction of tax at source under section 193, where these loans are held by non-resident persons, and, if so, whether foreign banks are entitled to receive the interest on those loans without deduction of tax at source even where these are held by the bank on behalf of a constituent. The position in the matter is stated in the following paragraphs.
2. By virtue of the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification (Income-tax) No. SO 3331, dated 19-10-1965, issued under clause (4) of section 10 non-residents are eligible for exemption from income-tax on their income by way of interest on 4¼ per cent National Defence Loan, 1968 and 4¾ per cent National Defence Loan, 1972. As a corollary to this position non-resident persons (corporate as also non-corporate) owning these loans are entitled to receive the interest thereon without deduc­tion of tax at source.
3. Resident persons are chargeable to income-tax on their income by way of interest on the above-mentioned loans. However clause (ia) of the proviso to section 193 exempts from deduction of tax at source the interest on these loans where this is payable to a resident individual. Where the interest is payable to residents who are not individuals (e.g., companies),tax is deductible at source from such interest.
4. In view of the position stated in the preceding paragraphs, where the above-mentioned loans are registered in the name of a non-resident bank, no tax is deductible at source from the inter­est if the beneficial ownership over the securities vests in the bank itself or in any of its constituents who is a non-resident. The same position obtains where the securities are deposited in a resident bank on behalf of a constituent who is resident individ­ual but not where such constituent is a resident person other than an individual (e.g., a resident company). In the latter case, tax will be deductible at source under section 193 from the inter­est on these securities.
5. Where a foreign bank holding 4¼ per cent National Defence Loan, 1968, or 4¾ per cent National Defence Loan, 1972, claims that it is entitled to receive payment of the interest on these loans without deduction of tax at source, it will be required to furnish to the Public Debt Office a declaration as to the benefi­cial ownership of these securities. Where the securities are beneficially owned by the bank itself or by a non-resident con­stituent of the bank, the interest will be paid without deduction of tax at source. Where the securities are beneficially owned by a resident constituent of the foreign bank, the declaration should further state whether the constituent is an individual or a person other than an individual (e.g., firm, company, etc.). Where the beneficial owner, according to this declaration,is a resident individual, the interest will be paid without deduction of tax at source. Where the beneficial owner is a resident person other than an individual, tax will be deducted at source from the interest on these securities. The Public Debt Offices of the Reserve Bank of India have been informed of the position stated above.
Circular : No. 13 [F. No. 12/224/68-ITCC], dated 14-4-1969.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In the Public Debt Office's decision whether to pay interest warrants gross, and in a section 201 question on interest paid without deduction on these loans.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 14  ·  Circular No. 10 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.