VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter II › Section 8
Chapter IIwas s.9B

Section 8 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 8 — Income on receipt of capital asset or stock-in-trade by specified person from specified entity. Successor to s.9B of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 8 is in Chapter II — Basis of Charge, which runs from section 4 to section 10.

← Section 7  ·  Section 9 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) deems a transfer: where a specified person receives during the tax year a capital asset or stock-in-trade, or both, from a specified entity in connection with the entity's dissolution or reconstitution, the entity is deemed to have transferred it to him in the year of receipt.

Sub-section (2) makes the resulting profits and gains the income of the specified entity for that tax year, chargeable under "Profits and gains of business or profession" or under "Capital gains". Sub-section (3) deems the fair market value on the date of receipt by the specified person to be the full value of the consideration.

Sub-sections (4) and (5) let the Board, with the previous approval of the Central Government, issue guidelines removing difficulties in this section and section 67(10), each laid before both Houses for a total of thirty days and subject to modification or annulment without prejudice to what was previously done.

Sub-section (6) defines the terms: a "specified entity" is a firm or other association of persons or body of individuals, not being a company or co-operative society; a "specified person" is a partner or member of such an entity in any tax year; and "reconstitution" covers a partner or member ceasing, new ones being admitted while some continue, and all continuing with a change in their respective shares.

Why it is there

When a partner leaves with an asset rather than money, the asset goes out without a sale and the accretion in its value would escape charge at the entity level. The section treats the handover as a transfer by the entity at fair market value. The wide definition of reconstitution stops the charge being avoided by rearranging shares instead of retiring a partner.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Period for which a guideline is laid before each HouseThirty daysA total period of thirty days, in one session or two or more successive sessionsSub-section (5)
Full value of consideration on the deemed transferFair market value of the assetAs on the date of its receipt by the specified person, not the date of the deed or dissolutionSub-section (3)

What this means in practice

The tax lands on the entity, not on the partner who takes the asset away. The trigger is receipt, so a retirement agreed in one year but given effect later is taxed in the later year. Because sub-section (3) substitutes fair market value on the date of receipt, the amount credited to the partner's capital account and the asset's book value are both irrelevant. The head of charge follows what was handed over, so one reconstitution can produce income under both heads.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A firm is reconstituted and a retiring partner takes a plot of land carried in the books at Rs 1 crore, worth Rs 4 crore on the day he receives it. The firm is deemed to have transferred the land for Rs 4 crore, and the gain is the firm's income of that tax year under "Capital gains". What his capital account was credited with does not enter the computation.

Where you meet this section

In the firm's or association's own assessment for the year the partner received the asset — the charge appears in the entity's return, not the outgoing partner's. A partner meets it indirectly, when the retirement or reconstitution deed is examined in the entity's proceedings.

The words themselves

fair market value of the capital asset or stock-in-trade, or both, on the date of its receipt by the specified person shall be deemed to be the full value of the consideration
Section 8(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 8. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.