VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXIII › Section 508
Chapter XXIIIwas s.285BA

Section 508 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 508 — Obligation to furnish statement of financial transaction or reportable account. Successor to s.285BA of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 508 is in Chapter XXIII — Miscellaneous, which runs from section 499 to section 536.

← Section 507  ·  Section 509 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) imposes the reporting obligation on twelve classes of person — an assessee; the prescribed person in the case of a Government office; a local authority or other public body or association; a Registrar or Sub-Registrar under the Registration Act, 1908; a motor vehicle registering authority under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; the Director General under the Post Office Act, 2023; the Collector under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; a recognised stock exchange; an officer of the Reserve Bank of India; a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996; a prescribed reporting financial institution; and any other prescribed person. Any of them who is responsible for registering, or maintaining books of account or other document containing a record of, any prescribed specified financial transaction or reportable account under any law in force must furnish a statement regarding it, with the information relevant and required for this Act, to the income-tax authority or such other authority or agency as may be prescribed.

Sub-section (2) leaves the period, time, form and manner of the statement to be prescribed. Sub-section (3) defines "specified financial transaction" as a transaction, as may be prescribed, of purchase, sale or exchange of goods, property or a right or interest in property; for rendering any service; under a works contract; by way of an investment made or expenditure incurred; or for taking or accepting a loan or deposit. Sub-section (4) lets the Board prescribe different values for different transactions for different persons, having regard to the nature of the transaction.

Sub-sections (5) and (6) deal with defects: the prescribed income-tax authority may intimate a defect and require rectification within thirty days, extendable at his discretion on an application, and if it remains unrectified within that or the extended period, the Act applies as if the person had furnished inaccurate information in the statement, overriding any other provision.

Sub-section (7) allows that authority, where a person fails to furnish the statement in time, to serve a notice requiring it within a period not exceeding thirty days from service, and he must furnish it within the time specified in the notice. Sub-section (8) requires a person who becomes aware of an inaccuracy in a statement furnished under sub-section (1) or pursuant to such a notice to inform the authority within ten days and furnish the correct information in the prescribed manner. Sub-section (9) lets the Central Government specify by rules the persons to be registered with the prescribed income-tax authority, the nature and manner of maintaining information, and the due diligence for identifying a reportable account.

Why it is there

The Department cannot see most transactions unless someone who records them in the ordinary course reports them, so the section converts registrars, banks, depositories, exchanges and other record keepers into a reporting network. Everything quantitative is left to the rules, which allows the reporting values to be set transaction by transaction and person by person without amending the Act. The defect machinery exists because a statement that is filed but wrong is of no use.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Time to rectify a defect in the statementThirty days from the date of the intimationOn intimation of the defect by the prescribed income-tax authority; extendable at his discretion on an application made for the purposeSub-section (5)
Time that may be allowed by a notice for a statement not furnishedA period not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of the noticeA ceiling on the period the prescribed income-tax authority may allow, not a fixed period; the person must furnish within the time specified in the noticeSub-section (7)
Time to report an inaccuracy discovered after filingWithin ten daysWhere the person, having furnished the statement under sub-section (1) or pursuant to a notice under sub-section (7), becomes aware of any inaccuracy in the information providedSub-section (8)
Transaction values that trigger reportingAs may be prescribedSub-section (4) lets the Board prescribe different values for different transactions for different persons, having regard to the nature of the transaction; the section itself states no monetary thresholdSub-sections (3) and (4)

What this means in practice

The section states no monetary threshold at all. Which transactions must be reported, and above what value, is left to the rules under sub-sections (3) and (4), and the Board may set different values for different transactions and different persons, so the obligation cannot be worked out from the section alone. The consequence of a defect is disproportionate to its appearance: under sub-section (6), a defect left unrectified beyond thirty days, or beyond any extension granted, makes the Act apply as if inaccurate information had been furnished, notwithstanding anything else. The thirty days in sub-section (7) is a ceiling on what the authority may allow, not an entitlement, and the duty is to furnish within the time actually specified. Sub-section (8) creates a continuing obligation with a much shorter clock — ten days from becoming aware of an inaccuracy — that runs after filing and is not triggered by any notice.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A depository furnishes its statement for the period and is later told by the prescribed income-tax authority that the statement is defective. It has thirty days from that intimation to rectify, and may apply for an extension, which the authority may grant at his discretion. If it does nothing and the thirty days pass, sub-section (6) makes the Act apply as if it had furnished inaccurate information in the statement. Separately, if three months after filing it discovers on its own that an account was wrongly reported, sub-section (8) requires it to inform the authority within ten days and furnish the correct information in the prescribed manner.

Where you meet this section

As the statement itself, furnished to the prescribed income-tax authority or other prescribed authority or agency; as a defect intimation under sub-section (5); and as a notice under sub-section (7) requiring a statement that was not filed on time.

The words themselves

the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such person had furnished inaccurate information in the statement
Section 508(6), Income-tax Act, 2025.
within a period not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of such notice
Section 508(7), Income-tax Act, 2025.
he shall within ten days, inform the prescribed income-tax authority ... of the inaccuracy and furnish the correct information
Section 508(8), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 508. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 508. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.