VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXII › Section 494
Chapter XXIIwas s.280

Section 494 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 494 — Disclosure of particulars by public servants. Successor to s.280 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 494 is in Chapter XXII — Offences and Prosecutions, which runs from section 473 to section 498.

← Section 493  ·  Section 495 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) makes it an offence for a public servant to furnish information or produce a document in contravention of section 258(3), punishable — as substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026 — with simple imprisonment up to one month, or with fine, or with both. Before that substitution the punishment was imprisonment which could extend to six months, with fine mandatory in addition. Sub-section (2) bars any prosecution under the section except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

Why it is there

It protects the confidentiality that section 258(3) imposes on information and documents held by the department, by making breach by a public servant a criminal offence. The sanction requirement keeps prosecution of public servants under central control, and the 2026 substitution materially reduces the punishment.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Punishment for the offenceSimple imprisonment up to one month, or fine, or bothAs substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026, replacing imprisonment which may extend to six months together with a mandatory fine494(1)

What this means in practice

Work from the substituted punishment: since 1 April 2026 the maximum is one month's simple imprisonment, imprisonment and fine are alternatives rather than cumulative, and a fine alone is available. No prosecution can be launched at all without the previous sanction of the Central Government, so the absence of sanction is a complete answer to a complaint under this section. What constitutes the contravention is not in this section — it turns entirely on section 258(3).

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A departmental officer passes an assessee's particulars to an outsider in contravention of section 258(3). He is liable to simple imprisonment up to one month, or to fine, or to both — the one-month maximum and the alternative form of sentence being what Act No. 4 of 2026 substituted with effect from 1 April 2026 for the earlier imprisonment up to six months with a mandatory fine. Even so, nothing follows automatically: sub-section (2) bars any prosecution under the section without the previous sanction of the Central Government, so a complaint filed without that sanction cannot be instituted at all.

Where you meet this section

In a prosecution of a public servant, which cannot even be instituted without the previous sanction of the Central Government under sub-section (2). A taxpayer does not meet this section directly — what he meets is the confidentiality restriction in section 258(3) that this section enforces.

The words themselves

shall be punishable with simple imprisonment up to one month, or with fine, or with both
Section 494(1), as substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026, Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 494. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.