VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXII › Section 480
Chapter XXIIwas s.276CCC

Section 480 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 480 — Failure to furnish return of income in search cases. Successor to s.276CCC of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 480 is in Chapter XXII — Offences and Prosecutions, which runs from section 473 to section 498.

← Section 479  ·  Section 481 →

What this section does

The section makes it an offence to wilfully fail to furnish in due time the return of income setting forth undisclosed income for the block period, where that return is required by a notice under section 294(1)(a). The punishment is graded by the amount of tax: simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, where the tax exceeds fifty lakh rupees; simple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both, where the tax exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; and fine alone in any other case.

Why it is there

The block return is how undisclosed income found in a search is brought on record, so failing to file it wilfully is treated as an offence rather than a mere default. Grading by the tax involved, with fine alone at the lower end, confines imprisonment to the larger cases.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Punishment where the tax exceeds fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or bothNo minimum term is prescribed480(a)
Punishment where the tax exceeds ten lakh rupees but not fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or bothThe tax must exceed ten lakh rupees for imprisonment to be available at all480(b)
Punishment in any other caseFineWhere the tax is ten lakh rupees or less, imprisonment is not available480(c)

What this means in practice

The offence turns on a wilful failure, so the return being late is not by itself enough — wilfulness has to be established, though section 490 places a presumption of culpable mental state on the accused. Which limb applies depends on the amount of tax, and at ten lakh rupees or below the only punishment available is a fine. Note that the punishments are maxima with no floor, so the court has full room below the stated terms.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A person served with a notice under section 294(1)(a) wilfully fails to furnish the block period return in due time, and the tax involved is Rs 60 lakh. Because that exceeds fifty lakh rupees, clause (a) applies — simple imprisonment for a term up to two years, or fine, or both, the section prescribing a maximum and no minimum. At Rs 45 lakh the case falls into clause (b) instead and the ceiling drops to six months. At Rs 8 lakh imprisonment disappears altogether and clause (c) leaves only a fine.

Where you meet this section

You meet it in a prosecution, not in an assessment: the offence is the wilful failure to furnish in due time the block period return called for by a notice under section 294(1)(a), and the trial is before the Special Court designated under section 495. The notice under section 294(1)(a) is what the person actually receives.

The words themselves

with simple imprisonment for a term up to two years, or with fine, or with both, where the amount of tax exceeds fifty lakh rupees
Section 480(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 480. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.