VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXII › Section 475
Chapter XXIIwas s.276

Section 475 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 475 — Removal, concealment, transfer or delivery of property to prevent tax recovery. Successor to s.276 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 475 is in Chapter XXII — Offences and Prosecutions, which runs from section 473 to section 498.

← Section 474  ·  Section 476 →

What this section does

The section creates an offence: whoever fraudulently removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person any property or any interest in property, with the intent to prevent that property or interest from being taken in execution of a certificate drawn under section 413, is punishable with simple imprisonment for a term up to two years and with fine. The punishment was substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026; before that substitution it read as rigorous imprisonment which may extend to two years, with liability to fine.

Why it is there

A recovery certificate is enforced against property, so putting that property beyond reach defeats recovery entirely; the section makes doing so fraudulently and with that intent a criminal offence rather than merely a civil obstacle.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Maximum punishmentSimple imprisonment up to 2 years, and fineOn conviction for fraudulently removing, concealing, transferring or delivering property with intent to prevent it being taken in execution of a certificate under section 413; substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026 for rigorous imprisonment up to two yearsSection 475

What this means in practice

The offence is not made out by the disposal alone: it requires the act to be fraudulent and to be done with the intent of preventing the property being taken in execution of a section 413 certificate, so the certificate is the reference point and intent has to be established. The person receiving the property is within the words "delivers to any person" as the counterparty to the delivery. Because the maximum is two years, the offence falls within the class that section 497 requires the Special Court to try as a summons case.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A Tax Recovery Officer draws a certificate under section 413 against a firm for unpaid tax. Before it can be executed, a partner transfers the firm's machinery to a relative for no real consideration so that it cannot be taken. That is the offence — the transfer was fraudulent and made with the intent to prevent the property from being taken in execution of the certificate — and it is punishable with simple imprisonment for a term up to two years, a maximum rather than a fixed term, and with fine. A transfer made at a fair price in the ordinary course, without that intent, is outside the section, which is not a strict-liability offence; and the section reaches an interest in property as much as the property itself.

Where you meet this section

In a criminal complaint and prosecution rather than in any assessment or recovery order. It comes into play only after a Tax Recovery Officer has drawn a certificate under section 413, when the property that certificate would be executed against has been moved, concealed, transferred or delivered away.

The words themselves

Whoever, fraudulently removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person, any property or any interest therein, with the intent to prevent such property or interest therein from being taken in execution of a certificate drawn under section 413
Section section 475, Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 475. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 475. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.