VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXII › Section 473
Chapter XXIIwas s.275A

Section 473 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 473 — Contravention of order made under section 247. Successor to s.275A of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 473 is in Chapter XXII — Offences and Prosecutions, which runs from section 473 to section 498.

← Section 472  ·  Section 474 →

What this section does

A single sentence creating an offence: whoever contravenes an order referred to in section 247(4) is punishable with simple imprisonment up to two years and with fine. Act No. 4 of 2026, with effect from 1 April 2026, substituted both the heading and the punishment, which previously read 'rigorous imprisonment which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine'.

Why it is there

It gives criminal force to a restraint order made in the course of a search under section 247(4), so that disobeying it is an offence rather than merely a procedural default.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Punishment for contravening a section 247(4) orderSimple imprisonment up to two years, and fineTwo years is the maximum; substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026 for 'rigorous imprisonment which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine'S.473

What this means in practice

The offence attaches to contravention of the order itself, so the question is whether an order under section 247(4) was in force and was disobeyed, not whether any tax was ultimately found due. From 1 April 2026 the imprisonment is simple rather than rigorous, though the two-year maximum is unchanged and a fine accompanies it.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An order referred to in section 247(4) — a restraint order made in the course of a search — is in force against a person, and he deals with what it covers anyway. Section 473 makes the contravention itself the offence, punishable with simple imprisonment up to two years and with fine, and whether any tax is ultimately found due on assessment is beside the point. Two years is the maximum and the section prescribes no minimum. Since 1 April 2026 the imprisonment is simple, Act No. 4 of 2026 having substituted that for the earlier 'rigorous imprisonment which may extend to two years'; the two-year ceiling and the fine are unchanged.

Where you meet this section

Not in any notice, return or assessment, but in a criminal prosecution before a court, launched on the contravention of an order referred to in section 247(4) during a search. The section names no form and no authority — only the offence and its punishment.

The words themselves

Whoever contravenes any order referred to in section 247(4) shall be punishable with simple imprisonment up to two years and with fine.
s.473, Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 473. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.