VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXI › Section 463
Chapter XXIwas s.271J

Section 463 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 463 — Penalty for furnishing incorrect information in reports or certificates. Successor to s.271J of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 463 is in Chapter XXI — Penalties, which runs from section 439 to section 472.

← Section 462  ·  Section 464 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) makes an accountant, a merchant banker or a registered valuer liable to a penalty of Rs. 10000 for any incorrect information in a report or certificate furnished under any provision of the Act or the rules made under it. Sub-section (2) makes the penalty payable for each such report or certificate. Sub-section (3) provides that it is payable on the directions of the Assessing Officer, the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals), where the incorrect information is found by that authority in the course of any proceedings under the Act.

Sub-section (4) defines a "merchant banker" as a Category I merchant banker registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India, and a "registered valuer" as a person registered as a valuer under section 514.

Why it is there

Large parts of the Act rely on a professional's certificate rather than on the Department's own verification, so the certificate has to carry a personal cost if it is wrong. The section places that cost on the person who signed, not on the assessee who relied on it, and by making the penalty payable for each report or certificate it scales with the volume of work rather than with the tax at stake.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Amount of the penaltyRs. 10000For any incorrect information in a report or certificate furnished under any provision of the Act or the rules made thereunderSub-section (1)
Basis on which the penalty multipliesPayable for each such report or certificateNot once per proceeding or per assesseeSub-section (2)

What this means in practice

The penalty falls on the professional personally. It is triggered by incorrect information, and the section requires no finding of dishonesty and no loss of tax, so it can attach to a certificate that produced no advantage to anyone. Sub-section (2) gives the section its bite: at Rs. 10000 for each report or certificate, a systematic error repeated across many certificates multiplies rather than being absorbed in a single penalty. Sub-section (3) confines who may direct it and when, and the definitions in sub-section (4) narrow the class exposed to a Category I merchant banker and a valuer registered under section 514.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An accountant furnishes certificates for five different assessees in a tax year, each carrying the same incorrect figure drawn from a template. The Assessing Officer finds the error in the course of proceedings and directs the penalty. Under sub-section (1) it is Rs. 10000 for the incorrect information, and under sub-section (2) it is payable for each such certificate, so the total is Rs. 50000 — payable by the accountant, not by any of the five assessees.

Where you meet this section

In a penalty direction issued by the Assessing Officer, the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals) during proceedings under the Act, addressed to the professional who signed the report or certificate rather than to the assessee it was furnished for.

The words themselves

shall be liable to pay a penalty of Rs. 10000 for any incorrect information in any report or certificate furnished under any provision of this Act or the rules made thereunder
Section 463(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
The penalty under sub-section (1) shall be payable for each such report or certificate.
Section 463(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.