VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XXI › Section 447
Chapter XXIwas s.271BA

Section 447 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 447 — Penalty for failure to furnish report under section 172. Successor to s.271BA of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 447 is in Chapter XXI — Penalties, which runs from section 439 to section 472.

← Section 446  ·  Section 448 →

What this section does

The section is empty. Its entire operative text has been omitted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026, and all that remains in the Act is the heading and the editorial note recording what stood there before. As it stood before omission, section 447 provided that if any person failed to furnish a report from an accountant as required by section 172, the Assessing Officer might impose a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 on that person. There is now no penalty in this section for anything.

Why it is there

The provision existed to back the section 172 accountant's report with a fixed penalty for non-furnishing. Its omission removes that penalty; the section's text supplies no replacement.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Penalty for failure to furnish the section 172 report, as the section stood before omissionRs. 1,00,000Imposable by the Assessing Officer on a person failing to furnish the accountant's report required by section 172; the provision was omitted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026Section 447, prior to omission

What this means in practice

Nothing is imposable under this section as it now reads. The obligation in section 172 to obtain and furnish an accountant's report is unaffected by the omission — only this penalty for failing to do so has gone. When reading older material that cites section 447 for a Rs. 1,00,000 penalty, check the date: the provision has no effect from 1 April 2026.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A person fails to furnish the accountant's report required by section 172 for a tax year falling on or after 1 April 2026. No penalty follows from section 447: Act No. 4 of 2026 omitted the whole of it with effect from that date, and nothing operative is left in the section. The Rs 1,00,000 that still appears beneath the section is the editorial note recording the provision as it stood before omission, not a live charge. The obligation in section 172 to obtain and furnish the report is untouched — only this penalty has gone.

Where you meet this section

You do not meet it at all any more. What a person still meets is the requirement in section 172 to obtain and furnish the accountant's report; the penalty that this section once attached to a failure was omitted with effect from 1 April 2026.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 447. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.